NASRULLAH KHAN vs MANZOOR HUSSAIN and others
This matter arises from a petition for leave to appeal filed by Nasrullah Khan against a judgment of the Lahore High Court. The petitioner, a Secretary of the Local Union Council, was accused in an FIR registered under sections 420, 461, 468, and 471 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 relating to forgery of death register entries. A local Judicial Magistrate had initially discharged the petitioner, agreeing with a police report that no evidence was found. However, the Lahore High Court set aside the discharge order upon a writ petition filed by the complainant, observing that the Magistrate had failed to provide grounds for concurrence, and directed the Superintendent of Police to entrust the investigation to a senior officer of repute. The core legal question concerned the propriety of the High Court's interference with the investigation and the setting aside of the Magistrate's discharge order. The Supreme Court of Pakistan held that the High Court's direction for a proper investigation through an independent officer under police supervision was unexceptionable. Consequently, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition and declined leave to appeal, affirming the principles regarding effective investigation of criminal offences.
- Can the High Court set aside a Magistrate's order discharging an accused where the Magistrate concurred with the police report without offering grounds?
- Whether the High Court has the power to direct a fresh or further investigation by a senior police officer of repute?
- Is a direction for a proper investigation through an independent officer under police supervision legally sustainable?
- Section 420, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 461, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 468, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 471, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
' FALAK SHER, J.---Nasrullah Khan petitioner, Secretary of the Local Union Council, an accused of the.
Case registered vide F.I.R. No,537 of 23-12-1999 under sections 420, 461, 468, 471, P.P.C. Police Station Saddar Bhakkar on the direction of Assistant Commissioner, Bhakkar having found after enquiring into Muhammad Hussain's application that the alleged fabrication of within mentioned mutations of gift of his mother's estate by his brother Manzoor Hussain, subsequent to her demise with the connivance of the local Revenue Officer, was incorrect and the mutations were genuine, conversely the banked upon death certificate/entries in the death register qua Mst. Ghulam Fatima were forged, inter alia by the petitioner, of which he was discharged by a local Judicial Magistrate concurring with the police request vide order dated 23-12-1999, reproduced hereinbelow:-- "The police record perused. During physical remand of the accused the police has failed to collect any evidence implicating the accused with the present case and the offence initially attributed to him, hence while agreeing with the police report, the accused is discharged of the case. On furnishing surety bond to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, he be released."
2. However, the same was set aside by a learned Judge of the Lahore High Court granting Manzoor Hussain's Writ Petition (No,2987 of 2000), directing entrustment of the investigation to some responsible officer of repute vide the impugned order dated 30-3-2002, observing the following:- "8. In the instant case, the learned trial Magistrate has not offered any ground whatsoever for concurring with the police report and it seems as if he had mortgaged his mind in favour of the police. The learned Assistant Advocate-General, who was present on Court's call, has frankly conceded on the above point.
9. In this view of the matter, I allow this petition, set aside the impugned order and direct S.P., Bhakkar, to depute a senior police officer of good repute serving under his command for investigation of the aforesaid case F.I.R. No, 537, dated 23-12-1999 registered at Police Station Saddar Bhakkar. The observation of the Assistant Commissioner should be given due weight. The Investigating Officer to be appointed by S.P. Bhakkar, is directed to conclude the investigation within one month under intimation to this Court and if satisfied that Muhammad Hussain had committed fraud and forgery etc. Under the aforesaid offences in connivance with respondent No,3, they should be proceeded against in accordance with law."
3. Against which leave to appeal is being sought contending interference with the investigation.
4. Which, we are afraid is ill-founded because direction for proper investigation through an independent officer under the supervision of the District Superintendent of Police is unexceptionable. Resultantly, is dismissed, declining leave.
Cited by 5 cases
- AMIN ALI Versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DADU 2026 PLD 304
- Nasira Ashfaq vs Director General Safe Cities Authority, Punjab and 6 2025 PCRLJ 233
- Nasira Ashfaq Versus Director General Safe Cities Authority, Punjab 2025 PCrLJ 233
- Umair Ishtiaq vs Station House Officer and 5 others 2023 PCRLJ 340
- Mian Saqib Nisar, Ejaz Afzal Khan, Mushir Alam and Manzoor Ahmad Malik JJYOUNAS ABBAS and others vs ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAKWAL and others 2016 PLD Supreme Court 581