HAZRAT ULLAH vs THE STATE
This application was filed under Section 426 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 seeking the suspension of sentence and grant of post-conviction bail on medical grounds. The petitioner had been convicted under Sections 302 and 307 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 and sentenced to death and ten years' rigorous imprisonment respectively. The core legal question was whether the proviso to Section 497(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, which permits bail for sick, infirm, or aged persons, can be invoked in an application for suspension of sentence under Section 426 during the pendency of an appeal. The High Court, relying on a psychiatric report demonstrating that the 90-year-old petitioner was severely depressed, senile, non-communicative, physically infirm, and on the serious ill list, accepted the application. The Court held that the principle embedded in the proviso to Section 497(1) applies to suspension of sentence applications under Section 426, granting bail on medical grounds subject to furnishing required security bonds.
- Can the proviso to Section 497(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 be invoked in an application for suspension of sentence under Section 426?
- Whether extreme old age, senility, and severe physical infirmity constitute valid grounds for suspension of a death sentence and admission to bail pending appeal?
- Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 307, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 426, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
- Section 497(1), Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
1. JAVID IQBAL, J.-Petitioner Hazratullah has been convicted under section 302, P. P. C. And sentenced to death. He has also been convicted under section 307, P. P. C. For murderous assault on one of the P. Ws. And sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment, This is an application for the suspension of sentences awarded to the petitioner on the ground that he was 90 years old and physically as well as mentally infirm. The petitioner has been in the Government Mental Hospital, Lahore since 1971. The report of Dr. M. A. A. Aziz Psychiatrist dated 27-8-1979 is to the effect that he was sad, depressed, senile, non-communicative, no contact with surroundings. He was on extra diet in view of his physical infirmity. He always lived in bed for preference and did not move. Complained of pain in chest. He was on serious ill list. This report is signed by, Dr. M. A. A. Aziz and has been endorsed by the Administrator, Government Mental Hospital, Lahore on 9-10-1979. Learned counsel points out to us that because of the physical as well as mental infirmity of the petitioner the Home Department of the Provincial Government had written to the Administrator, Government Mental Hospital, Lahore, on the 4th of July 1979 that the Governor of the Punjab was pleased to order for the release of the petitioner, who was a mental patient, aged 90 years, and had been admitted in the said hospital through the Rawalpindi Jail Authority in 1971. He was directed to be handed over to his son for taking him home. But later on this memo was cancelled vide subsequent memo. Dated 29th of July 1979 in which it was stated that the record indicated that an appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Rawalpindi dated 28-4-1971 sentencing the petitioner to death was pending in the Lahore High Court and that the matter should be moved first through counsel in the Lahore High Court and then after completion of legal action he may submit mercy petition to the Government for consideration. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was 90 years old and was mentally as well as physically infirm and that therefore, his case was covered by the proviso to section 497, sub--section (I), Cr. P. C. Which can be invoked in an application for suspension of sentence under section 426, Cr. P. C. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to controvert the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner. We, therefore, admit the petitioner to bail on medical ground subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 30,000 (Rupees thirty thousand only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. This petition stands disposed of.
Cited by 7 cases
- SAFDAR SHAH Versus State 2022 YLRN 135
- Khamiso alias JOGI and another vs The State 2020 MLD 1614
- AMMAR FAROOQ vs THE STATE 2013 PLD Sindh 508
- FAZAL RAHIM vs THE STATE 2004 PLD Lahore 266
- ALLAH YAR and another vs THE STATE 1996 P Cr. L J 211
- ALTAF HUSSAIN SHAH vs THE STATE- 1986 P Cr. L J 2202
- EJAZ AHMED MALIK vs THE STATE 1980 P Cr. L J 1129