TAJ ALI KHAN vs THE STATE
This petition for post-arrest bail was filed by the petitioner, Taj Ali Khan, who was charged under Section 9 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997 after allegedly being found in possession of 1500 grams of Charas. The core legal question was whether the petitioner was entitled to bail given the quantity of contraband recovered and his lack of criminal history. The Peshawar High Court held that because the recovered quantity of 1500 grams marginally exceeded the 1000-gram threshold, it constituted a borderline case between clauses (b) and (c) of Section 9 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997. Additionally, whether the maximum alternative punishment of 14 years would be awarded remained a matter of further inquiry. Since the petitioner had no prior convictions or involvement in similar offenses, the Court allowed the petition and granted bail. The key principle laid down is that borderline recovery quantities marginally exceeding statutory thresholds, coupled with a clean criminal record, can make a case fit for further inquiry, justifying the grant of bail.
- Whether a recovery of narcotics marginally exceeding the statutory threshold of 1000 grams constitutes a borderline case making the matter fit for further inquiry under bail provisions?
- Can post-arrest bail be granted in a narcotics case where the accused has no previous criminal record of committing similar offenses?
- Does the uncertainty of whether the maximum alternative statutory punishment will be awarded justify the grant of bail on the ground of further inquiry?
- Section 9, Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997
- Section 9(b), Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997
- Section 9(c), Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997
' Taj Ali. Khan, petitioner is seeking bail in case F.I.R. No,256 dated 30-6-2003 for offence under section 9, C.N.S. Act Police Station, Lakki Marwat.
' The allegations against him are that when he was confronted with Muhammad Tahir, S.H.O. He attempted to run away but was apprehended and in that course he had thrown a plastic wrapper which was collected from the ground and 1500 grams Charas was found therein, therefore, he was booked under the above F.I.R.
2. Arguments heard and record perused.
3. Not only because the quantity of 500 grams marginally exceeds the upper limit of 1000 grams, therefore, being a border line case between clause 'B' and 'C' of section 9 and also because in the given circumstances whether maximum punishment of 14 years provided in the alternative would be awarded or not is also a point of discussion and further inquiry. Also from the record it is not established that he is a previous convict or involved in the same and similar offence in the past.
4. For the above reasons, this petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted bail in the sum of Rs,50,000 with two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Alaqa/Judicial Magistrate. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.
Cited by 27 cases
- REHMAT GUL Versus State 2022 PCrLJN 48
- ASGHAR ALI Versus State 2022 PCrLJN 86
- KHUSH AMDEEN Versus State 2018 PCrLJN 85
- NAIMATULLAH and anothers vs The STATE 2017 MLD 1097
- USMAN Versus State 2017 YLRN 94
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM vs The STATE 2016 P Cr. LJ 1075
- ZAKIR Versus State 2016 PCrLJN 83
- WAJID alias WAJI vs The STATE 2016 P Cr. LJ 831
- ASHRAF vs The STATE 2014 YLR 639
- Mst. NASEEBAN vs STATE PLJ 2012 Cr.C. (Karachi) 447
- Mst. NASEEBAN vs THE STATE PLJ 2012 Cr.C. (Karachi) 447, 2012 P Cr. L J 869
- SHAH MEHMOOD alias SHAHU vs THE STATE 2012 YLR 1403
- INAYAT alias ANO vs THE STATE 2012 MLD 926
- YOUSIF KHAN vs THE STATE 2011 YLR 329
- NAEEM vs THE STATE 2011 YLR 858
- ABDULLAH vs THE STATE 2012 MLD 1171
- AYAZ Versus State 2011 PCrLJ 177
- AIJAZ ALI SHAH vs THE STATE 2010 YLR 2387
- AACHAR vs THE STATE 2010 YLR 794
- AGHA KHAN vs THE STATE 2009 YLR 1275
- LIAQ SHAH vs THE STATE 2009 YLR 135
- HAKEEM SHAH vs STATE 2008 PLJ Cr. C (Peshawar) 1078
- HAKEEM SHAH vs THE STATE 2008 YLR 2014
- IBRAR vs STATE 2008 PLJ Cr. C (Peshawar) 1076
- IBRAR vs THE STATE 2008 P Cr. L J 1449
- SHERIN MUHAMMAD vs STATE PLJ 2006 Cr.C. (Peshawar) 453
- SHERIN MUHAMMAD vs THE STATE 2006 P Cr. L J 726