Pakistan Case Law
PLD 1979 Lahore 34(1)

MUKHTAR SULTANA vs TASADAQ (TASADAQ HUSSAIN)

⭐ Prefer in Google
CitationPLD 1979 Lahore 34(1)
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.T. A. No. 317/C of 1976
Date1977-02-02
Judge(s)Aftab Hussain
ResultOrder accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a petition seeking the transfer of a family suit. The core legal question concerns the appropriate forum and consolidation of cross-suits—specifically, a suit for restitution of conjugal rights and a suit for dissolution of marriage—pending in different cities. The Lahore High Court held that it is in the interest of justice and balance of convenience to have both related matrimonial suits tried together in one court. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and ordered the transfer of the respondent's suit from the Family Court at Bahawalpur to the Family Court at Multan where the petitioner's suit was pending. The key principle laid down is that where cross-suits regarding matrimonial disputes are instituted between the same parties in different courts, the balance of convenience dictates their consolidation and trial in a single court to avoid conflicting decisions and hardship.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether two related suits for restitution of conjugal rights and dissolution of marriage pending in different courts can be consolidated in one court?
  • Does the balance of convenience serve as a ground for transferring a family suit from one city to another?
  • Can a suit pending before a Family Court at Bahawalpur be transferred to a Family Court at Multan?
transfer of family suitrestitution of conjugal rightsdissolution of marriageconsolidation of suitsbalance of conveniencefamily court

I have heard Mr. Manzoor Ahmad, Advocate for the respondent. He has raised objection that the suit for restitution of conjugal rights was filed earlier than the suit for dissolution of marriage. He also argued that the family of the petitioner is living at Bahawalpur.

2. After considering the arguments I am of the view that it will b better if the two suits, one for 'restitution of conjugal rights' and the other for 'dissolution of marriage' are consolidated in one Court. The balance o1 convenience is in transferring the suit of the respondent to the Court it Multan. I, therefore, allow the petition, direct that the suit of Tasadm Hussain v. Mukhtar Sultana and others pending in the Family Court, Bahawal pur, be transferred to the Family Court at Multan (Mr. Afzal Hussain Kazmi Judge Family Court).

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.