ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX-II, LAHORE vs Messrs B.O.C. PAKISTAN
This sales tax appeal was filed by the Additional Collector of Sales Tax-II, Lahore, challenging a judgment by the Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The core legal question was whether an amendment to section 2(46) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, introduced via the Finance Act, 1996, which established a Valuation Committee, could be applied retrospectively to tax evasion cases involving the period from July 1993 to June 1994, where detection occurred in April 1995. The Lahore High Court held that the creation of the Valuation Committee was a procedural amendment rather than a substantive one. Consequently, the court determined that the amendment applied to all pending cases, including those arising before the amendment's enactment, as it did not alter the substantive rights of the parties or cause prejudice. The court upheld the Tribunal's direction for the Valuation Committee to assess the taxable supplies, affirming that the procedural change was both lawful and practicable for resolving valuation controversies in pending matters.
- Does the creation of a Valuation Committee under the Sales Tax Act, 1990 constitute a procedural or substantive amendment?
- Can a procedural amendment to the Sales Tax Act, 1990 be applied to pending cases involving tax periods prior to the amendment's enactment?
- Does the retrospective application of a procedural amendment regarding tax valuation violate the rights of the parties involved?
- Section 2(46)(e), Sales Tax Act 1990
- Section 2(46), Sales Tax Act 1990
- Finance Act 1996
ORDER
' By this sales tax appeal the Additional Collector of Sales Tax-II, Lahore has challenged the judgment of the learned Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lahore ("Tribunal") dated 5-12-1998 on the ground that the learned Tribunal was wrong in directing the assessment of the valuation of the taxable supplies made by the respondent No,1 company by the Valuation Committee constituted under section 2(46)(e) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. The challenge is precisely stated in the question of law formulated as follows:--- "Whether the amendment made in Sales Tax Act, 1990 section 2(46) effective, 1-7-1996 through Finance Act, 1996 could apply to contravention and evasion of Sales Tax relating to period from July, 1993 to June, 1994 and wherein detection was made on 26-4-1995?
2. The forum of the Valuation Committee was created by an amendment of a procedural nature in the Sales Tax Act, 1990 in the year 1996. Such forum is meant to facilitate the determination of the controversies between parties on the question of valuation. Being a procedural amendment it applies to all pending cases. There is no change in the, substantive rights of the parties pursuant to the said amendment and therefore no objection on the ground of prejudice by retrospectivity is made out. Resultantly the direction given by the learned Tribunal is in the circumstances of the case both lawful as well practicable. The appellant shall implement the same in accordance with law. .
Cited by 5 cases
- MUHAMMAD RASHEED vs CH. MUNSHI KHAN and 7 others 2016 PLJ AJ&K 135
- MUHAMMAD RASHEED Versus Ch. MUNSHI KHAN 2016 MLD 523
- PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PIDC) and anothers vs M. IQBAL, Sole Proprietor of Messrs PEMSECO and 3 others 2015 CLC 1066
- Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC) andanother vs M. 2015 CLC 1066, 2015 PLJ Islamabad 63, 2015 P.C.T.L.R. 617
- PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PIDC) & another vs M. 2015 PLJ Islamabad 63