Pakistan Case Law
2006 PTD 537

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX (WEST), KARACHI vs Messrs K & A INDUSTRIES, KARACHI

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2006 PTD 537
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No,387-K of 2004 S.T.A. No, 595 of 2002
Date2005-07-12
Judge(s)Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C. J. and M. Javed Buttar
Authored byIftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry
ResultLeave refused
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This petition, filed by the Collector of Customs, Sales Tax (West), Karachi, challenges an order of the High Court of Sindh Karachi which allowed an appeal by the respondent and struck down a demand for Additional Tax on the ground that the show-cause notice was time-barred. The core legal question before the Supreme Court of Pakistan was whether the show-cause notice dated 12th August 1999, issued in respect of the tax year 1994-95, was within the prescribed limitation period of three years under subsection (2) of section 36 of the Sales Tax Act. The Supreme Court held that the petitioner's counsel failed to explain how the notice was within the prescribed limitation and concluded that the show-cause notice was indeed served beyond the period of limitation prescribed by the statute. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and leave to appeal was declined, affirming the High Court's decision to non-suit the petitioner based on limitation.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether a show-cause notice issued under the Sales Tax Act beyond the prescribed limitation period of three years is legally sustainable?
  • Does a demand for Additional Tax survive if the underlying show-cause notice is time-barred under subsection (2) of section 36 of the Sales Tax Act?
Laws & provisions referred
  • subsection (2) of section 36 of the Sales Tax Act
sales taxshow-cause noticelimitation periodadditional taxtax demandpetroleum and customs

ORDER

IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J.---This petition calls in question the following order passed by the High Court of Sindh Karachi:-- "By the impugned order the appeal filed by the respondent was allowed and the demand of Additional Tax was struck down for the reason that the show-cause notice, dated 12-8-1999 was beyond the prescribed limitation, in terms of subsection (2) of section 36 of the Sales Tax Act, Mr. Abdul Sattar Silat was not able to dislodge the finding which is based on facts. Consequently, the appeal has no merits and the same is dismissed, with no order as to costs."

2. Learned counsel when confronted with the provisions of subsection (2) of section 36 of the Sales Tax Act, and was called upon to explain as to whether in respect of the year of 1994-95, show- cause notice, dated 12th August, 1999, was within the prescribed limitation i,e, three years. He could not answer satisfactorily. Thus it is held that show-cause notice was served beyond the period of limitation as prescribed in subsection (2) of section 36 of the Sales Tax Act and as such learned High Court had rightly non-suited the petitioner.

' Petition is dismissed and leave declined. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.

Cited by 24 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.