UNITED BANK LIMITED through Assistant Vice-President vs REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, REGIONAL DIRECTORATE OF LABOUR and another
This constitutional petition was filed by United Bank Limited challenging the registration of respondent No.2, United Bank Ltd. Employees Union, by the Provincial Registrar. During the pendency of the petition, the National Industrial Relations Commission (N.I.R.C.) passed an order certifying establishments of UBL into Collective Bargaining Units (CBUs) and directed registered trade unions to amend their constitutions to open membership accordingly within one month, failing which they would be deemed non-existent. The core legal question concerned the effect of the N.I.R.C.'s certification and directions on the status of locally registered trade unions that failed to comply. The Sindh High Court held that since respondent No.2 failed to comply with the N.I.R.C.'s directions and lost its registered status, the petition was to be disposed of with a direction to the Provincial Registrar to do away with the registration of respondent No.2 in accordance with the N.I.R.C.'s order. The key principle established is that local trade unions failing to comply with N.I.R.C. CBU certification directions cease to exist.
- What is the legal effect on local trade unions when the National Industrial Relations Commission certifies establishments as Collective Bargaining Units and mandates constitutional amendments?
- Whether a trade union that fails to comply with the National Industrial Relations Commission's directions regarding CBU membership ceases to be a registered trade union?
ORDER
1. ' MUNIB AHMED KHAN, J.----The subject of this petition relate to the grievance of the petitioner in respect to the registration of respondent No,2 i,e, United Bank Ltd. Employees Union on the ground that it was registered by the Provincial Registrar and that was not legal and proper and that registration was challenged through instant Writ Petition No,308/04 before this Court wherein one of the objection taken was, that a reference has been made by the Federal Government to the National Industrial Relations Commission (N.I.R.C.) to certify one or more C.B.Us in the U.B.L. To deal with the matter all over the country.
2. ' During pendency of this petition, the matter was heard by the N.I.R.C. Which disposed of the matter by its order dated 6-4-2006 and the relevant para of the order is as follows:-- "Keeping in view above discussion, I therefore, declare and certify all the establishments of UBL situated in the Province of Sindh and Balochistan as one CBU and Provinces of Punjab, N.-W.F.P. And Federal Capital territory the other CBU and direct all the registered trade unions registered with the Provincial Registrars or with the N.I.R.C. To amend their constitution through opening their membership to the workers employed in the respective CBUs within one month failing which they would be deemed to be non-existent. This decision will remain in force for a period of five years."
3. ' He has further submitted that the above direction of the N.I.R.C. So far has been followed by five unions and a certificate in this respect has been obtained from the Deputy Registrar N.I.R.C. The copy of said certificate is submitted which shows that the name of the respondent No,2 is missing from the certificate hence it is no more a registered trade union in terms of the direction of N.I.R.C.
4. ' Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a decision reported in PLD 1984 Karachi 292 which was approved by Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Appeal No,202-K of 1991 decided on 8th December, 1991 on the ground that if the matter of registration is taken up by the N.I.R.C. And decided in terms of its direction then local CBAs and local registered unions will be ceased to be in existence.
5. ' Learned counsel for the respondent No,2 states that the order of the N.I.R.C. Is not being disputed now nor the certificates issued by the N.I.R.C. Regarding registration of CBAs in terms of its direction but after the decision by N.I.R.C. He has no contact with the respondent No,2.
6. ' It seems that the respondent No,2 has lost interest in the matter and it does not want to be enrolled as CBA in terms of the N.I.R.Cs. Order. In the circumstances, the respondent No,1 is directed to act in terms of the direction contained in the order of the N.I.R.C. And to do away with the registration of the respondent No,2.
7. ' The petition stands disposed of along with listed application.
Cited by 4 cases
- SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2018 CLCN 126
- HABIB BANK WORKERS FRONT OF PAKISTAN, 516-UNI PLAZA, CHUNDRIGAR 2014 PLJ Tr.C. (NIRC) 4
- HABIB BANK WORKERS' FRONT OF PAKISTAN vs REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, DIRECTORATE OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others 2014 PLC 229
- HABIB BANK WORKERS' FRONT OF PAKISTAN vs REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS 2015 PLC 125