MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN vs THE PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary and others
This constitutional petition was filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 by the Chief Justice of Pakistan, challenging a presidential Reference, a compulsory leave order, and restraining orders issued against him. The Supreme Court of Pakistan unanimously held the petition to be maintainable. By a majority of 10 to 3, the Court set aside the President's direction (the Reference) dated March 9, 2007, issued under Article 209(5) of the Constitution. Furthermore, the Court unanimously declared the Judges (Compulsory Leave) Order, 1970 (President's Order No. 27 of 1970) to be ultra vires of the Constitution, and consequently invalidated the President's order placing the Chief Justice on compulsory leave. The Court also unanimously set aside the restraining orders preventing the Chief Justice from performing his duties, and declared the appointments of the Acting Chief Justices to be without lawful authority, while validating their past actions under the de-facto doctrine. The petitioner was restored to his office as Chief Justice of Pakistan.
- Whether a constitutional petition filed by the Chief Justice of Pakistan challenging a presidential reference under Article 209(5) is maintainable under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973?
- Is the Judges (Compulsory Leave) Order, 1970 (President's Order No. 27 of 1970) constitutionally valid?
- Can the President or the Supreme Judicial Council restrain the Chief Justice of Pakistan from performing judicial and administrative functions pending a reference?
- What is the legal status of the appointments of Acting Chief Justices made during the unlawful suspension or compulsory leave of the permanent Chief Justice of Pakistan?
- Article 184(3), Constitution of Pakistan 1973
- Article 187, Constitution of Pakistan 1973
- Article 209(5), Constitution of Pakistan 1973
- Judges (Compulsory Leave) Order, 1970 (President's Order No. 27 of 1970)
ORDER
1. For detailed reasons to be recorded later, the following issues arising out of this petition are decided as under:
(I) MAINTAINABILITY OF COP NO.21 OF 2007 FILED UNDER ARTICLE 184(3) OF THE CONSTITUTION ' This petition is unanimously declared to be maintainable.
(II) VALIDITY OF THE DIRECTION (THE REFERENCE) ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 209(5) OF THE CONSTITUTION ' By a majority of 10 to 3 (Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, J., M.Javed Buttar, J. And Saiyed Saeed Ashhad, J. Dissenting), the said direction (the Reference) in question dated March 9, 2007, for separate reasons to be recorded by the Hon. Judges so desiring, is set aside.
(III) VIRES OF JUDGES (COMPULSORY LEAVE) ORDER BEING PRESIDENT'S ORDER NO. 27 OF 1970 AND THE CONSEQUENT VALIDITY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.3.2007 PASSED BY THE PRESIDENT DIRECTING THAT THE CJP SHALL BE ON LEAVE ' The said President's Order No,27 of 1970 is, unanimously declared as ultra vires of the Constitution and consequently the said order of the President dated 15.3.2007 is also, unanimously declared to have been passed without lawful authority.
(IV) VALIDITY OF THE ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT DATED 9.3.2007 AND OF .THE ORDER OF THE SAME DATE OF THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COUNCIL RESTRAINING THE CJP FROM ACTING AS A JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT AND/OR CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN ' Both these orders are, unanimously, set aside as being illegal. However, since according to the minority view on the question of the validity of the direction (the Reference) in question, the said Reference had been competently filed by the President, therefore, this Court could pass a restraining order under Article 184(3) read with Article 187 of the Constitution.
(V) VALIDITY OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICES OF PAKISTAN IN VIEW OF THE ANNU LMENT OF THE TWO RESTRAINING ORDERS AND THE COMPULSORY LEAVE ORDER IN RESPECT OF THE CJP ' The appointments in question of the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justices of Pakistan vide notification dated 9.3,2007 and the notification dated 22-3-2007 are, unanimously, declared to have been made without lawful authority. However, this in-validity shall not affect the ordinary working of the Supreme Court or the discharge of any other Constitutional and/or legal obligations by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justices of Pakistan during the period in question and this declaration is so made by applying the de-facto doctrine.
(VI) ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN ' It has never been anybody's case before us that the Chief Justice of Pakistan was not accountable. The same issue, therefore, does not require any adjudication.
2. ' All other legal and Constitutional issues raised before us shall be answered in due course through the detailed judgment/judgments to follow.
3. ORDER OF THE COURT By majority of 10 to 3 (Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, J., M. Javed Buttar, J. And Saiyed Saeed Ashhad, J.
4. Dissenting), this Constitution Original Petition No, 21 of. 2007 filed by Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, the Chief Justice of Pakistan, is allowed as a result whereof the above-mentioned direction (the Reference) of the President dated March 9, 2007 is set aside. As a further consequence thereof, the petitioner CJP shall be deemed to be holding the said office and shall always be deemed to have been so holding the same.
5. ' The other connected petitions shall be listed before the appropriate Benches, in due course, for their disposal in accordance with law.
Cited by 13 cases
- FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and anothers vs SAEED AHMED KHAN and others 2015 CLC 1797
- FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another vs SAEED AHMED KHAN and others 2016 PLC (C.S.) 48
- MUHAMMAD AZHAR SIDDIQUI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 PLD 774
- INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS CORPORTION (PVT.) LTD through Authorised 2014 PLD Islamabad 7
- SUO MOTU CASE NO.4 OF 2010 Versus 2012 PLD 553
- FAISAL SULTAN vs E.D.O. (EDUCATION) and others 2011 PLC (C.S.) 419
- JUSTICE KHURSHID ANWAR BHINDER and others vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another 2010 PLD Supreme Court 483
- SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION through its Secretary Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad 2009 PLD 879
- SINDH-HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY NADEEM AHMED, ADVOCATE vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS 2010 NLR Civil 30
- CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST SYED YOUSAF RAZA GILLANI, THE PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN REGARDING NON-COMPLIANCE OF THIS COURT'S ORDER DATED 16-12-2009 vs N_A 2012 PLJ SC 715
- Muhammad Azhar Siddique, Imran Khan, Kh. Muhammad Asif and others 2012 PSC (Crl.) 594
- General (R) Parvez Musharraf vs Nadeem Ahmed (Advocate) and another 2014 PSC 1219
- PARVEZ MUSHARRAF Versus NADEEM AHMED 2014 PLD 585