MUHAMMAD SADIQ vs SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KARA and others
The petitioner, a police official proceeded against under the Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, challenged the dismissal of his appeal by the Punjab Service Tribunal regarding the alteration of his penalty from compulsory retirement to reduction in rank from Sub-Inspector to Assistant Sub-Inspector. The core legal question raised was whether Rule 1.2 of Chapter 4(4.12) of the C.S.R. (Punjab) Volume I requiring the specification of the period for which a penalty shall remain operative applies to the Police Force in view of Rule 1.4 of the C.S.R., and whether reduction in rank operates perpetually if no period is specified. The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal to consider the applicability of the C.S.R. rules to the police force and the legal consequences regarding the duration and automatic restoration of rank following the imposition of such a penalty. The Court laid down that where a minor penalty of reduction in rank is imposed, the legal implications of the absence of a specified operative period and the applicability of special service rules require detailed examination.
- Whether Rule 1.2 of the C.S.R. is applicable to Police Force in view of Rule 1.4 of the C.S.R.?
- Whether the reduction in rank of an official is intended to operate perpetually if no operative period is specified?
- Whether on expiry of the prescribed penalty period, a civil servant automatically regains the post from which he was reverted or requires a fresh selection process for promotion?
- Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975
ORDER
' SYED. JAMSHED ALI, J.--- The petitioner was proceeded against under the Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 and was directed to be compulsorily retired vide order, dated 28-11-2000 which was maintained by the appellate Authority. However, the Inspector-General (Punjab); on the revision petition of the petitioner altered the penalty to reduction in rank from Sub-Inspector to Assistant Sub-Inspector. The appeal filed before the learned Punjab Service Tribunal having been dismissed the petitioner has approached this Court.
2. The only contention pressed before us that no period during which the penalty shall remain operative was specified although it is so clearly required by Rule 1.2 of Chapter 4(4.12) of the C.S.R.
(Punjab) Volume I. Reliance is being placed on Muhammad Riaz and others v. Province of the Punjab through Secretary, Education Department, Punjab, Lahore and others 2004 SCM R 1437 wherein this Court has given effect to Rule 4.12.
3. The perusal of the Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 shows that in case of minor penalty the competent authority is required to specify the period for which the said penalty shall remain in force. We have noticed that Rule 1. 1 of C.S.R applies to the Police Force but Rule L4 of`Chapter I, excludes application of the said rules to the persons fof whose appointment and conditions of service special provision is made under any law far the time being in-force.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are inclined to grant leave, to consider the following questions:- "(i) Whether-Rule 1.2 of the C.S.R. Is applicable to Police Force in view of Rule 1.4 of the C.S.R.? Case said rule is held not to be applicable, then whether the reduction in rank of an official is intended to operate perpetually?
' In case period during which the penalty has to remain operative, is required to be prescribed, then whether on expiry of said period, civil servant shall automatically regain the post from which he was reverted or he will be required to undergo the process of selection to earn his promotion."