(2007 P.C.T.L.R. 66)
M/S. Al-Catal Pakistan Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.
These petitions were called multiple times for hearing before the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Due to the continuous non-appearance of the petitioner, the court dismissed the petitions for want of prosecution. The judgment addresses the procedural consequence of a party failing to appear to prosecute their case.
Questions settled in this judgment
- What is the consequence when a petitioner fails to appear for the hearing of a petition?
- Can petitions be dismissed for want of prosecution when no one appears for the petitioner?
1. These petitions have been called a number of times but no one has appeared for the petitioner, therefore, the same are dismissed for want of prosecution.