SHAMMON alias SAMANDAR vs THE STATE
This is a criminal bail application before the Sindh High Court where the applicant, Shammon alias Samandar, sought post-arrest bail in a case involving allegations of lurking house-trespass and injuries. The core legal question was whether the applicant was entitled to the concession of bail considering the nature of the offence, the quantum of punishment, and the existence of previous enmity between the parties. The court held that since the maximum punishment for the alleged offence is ten years, the applicant has been remanded to judicial custody, investigation is complete with the submission of the challan, and previous enmity exists, the case warrants further inquiry. Consequently, the court granted post-arrest bail to the applicant subject to furnishing the required surety and personal recognizance bonds. The key principle laid down is that where an accused is no longer required for investigative purposes, the challan has been submitted, and mitigating factors such as previous enmity and debatable applicability of penal provisions exist, post-arrest bail should generally be granted.
- Is an accused entitled to post-arrest bail when the challan has been submitted and no further police investigation is required?
- Does the existence of previous enmity between the parties support the grant of bail in offences carrying a maximum punishment of ten years?
- Whether bail should be granted when the applicability of specific penal provisions requires further inquiry?
- Section 459, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
ORDER
1. ' AMIR HANI MUSLIM, J.---According to the learned counsel,the allegations against the applicant is that he was accompanying with other, two co-accused and the allegation in record to each injury caused to the Complainant's brother is punishable for 2 years. He submits that there was previous enmity between the parties and the provisions of section 459, P.P.C. Are not attracted in the present case.
2. ' Learned Asstt: A.G. Opposes the bail application as according to him it was a case of lurking house trespass and injury was caused by the Applicant and other co-accused.
3. ' I have heard the learned counsel and perused the record.
4. ' The maximum punishment provided for the offence is 10 years and there appears to be previous enmity between the parties. The applicants have been remanded to judicial custody and are not required A for police investigation. The challan has been submitted in Court, therefore, I grant bail to the Applicant subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs,1,00,000 (one Lac) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court.
Cited by 2 cases
- Imtiaz @ Faqeera Jakhrani vs The State 2020 SHC 828
- MUHAMMAD ACHAR Versus State 2018 YLRN 234