The Collector (Appeals), Collectorate Of Customs Central Excise & Sales
This matter arises from a petition for leave to appeal filed by the Collector (Appeals), Collectorate of Customs Central Excise & Sales against the judgment of the High Court of Sindh, which had allowed a constitutional petition filed by respondent No. 1 against the demand for central excise duty on edible synthetic organic dye stuff commonly known as food colors. The core legal question was whether edible food colors fall within the scope of 'colors' under Item No. 04.03 of the Schedule to the Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944. The Supreme Court held that the expression 'colors' in the said item must be interpreted in the context of the heading 'paints, pigments, varnishes and polishes', and that edible food colors constitute an altogether different species having no connection with paints and varnishes. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, affirming the High Court's judgment setting aside the excise duty demand and directing a refund, thereby laying down the principle that statutory items concerning industrial and chemical products must be interpreted contextually in light of their specific headings.
- Do edible synthetic organic dye stuffs known as food colors fall within the expression 'colors' under Item No. 04.03 of the Schedule to the Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944?
- How should general expressions like 'colors' be interpreted when appearing under a specific statutory heading such as paints, pigments, varnishes, and polishes?
- Section 12(B), Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944
- Item No. 04.03, Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944
KARAMAT NAZIR BHANDARI, J.- Respondent No.1/its predecessor M/s. Far Eastern Impex, a partnership I concern has been dealing in the business of packing, re- I packing and selling completely manufactured synthetic I organic Dye Stuff commonly known as 'Food Colors'. "Food I colors" are edible and are used for food preparation. Since I 1974, clearance of food colors was being permitted without I payment of excise duty. For the first time in the year 1989, J respondent No. 1 was asked to file the relevant return and pay excise duty. The arrears amounting to Rs. I 12,65,173.39/-.Were also demanded for the period between I 15.4.1985 to 15.6.1988. By another letter, a demand in the I sum of Rs. 6,15,898.43/- was made for the period from July, I 1988 to June, 1989.
The respondent No. 1 challenged the I demand in the hierarchy by way of appeal" and revision but I without any success. Application of respondent No. 1 for exemption under Section 12(B) of the Central Excise & Salt I Act, 1944 was also rejected and the demand for payment of. I the arrears was reiterated. This led respondent No. 1 to I challenge the action/demand in the High Court of Sindh at, Karachi by filing Constitutional Petition (C.P. No. D- 22/2000). This petition was allowed vide judgment dated 28.12.2001 by a learned Division Bench of the Court. After setting aside the order, the Court directed refund of the recovered amounts. The petitioners solicit leave to appeal from the afore-said judgment.
2. The fate of the case hinges on the language of Item No. 04.03 of the Schedule to the Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944. This item appears in Section IV headed ."PRODUCTS OF CHEMICAL AND ALLIED INDUSTRIES".. The item is reproduced- 04.03 Paints, Pigments, Varnishes, and Polishes-- All Sorts of paints (including products known as or used or cement- paints), pigments, distempers, colors, dyes, enamels, varnishes, .Glazes, lusters, thinners, blacks, cellulose lacquers and polishes (except creams and polishes falling under item No. 04.01) and their ancillaries, in any form, liquid, solid, semi-solid, paste, powder of granules--
(i) if retail price and quantity 22 per cent are retail price, legibly, of the retail prominently and infe;iable price printed on each container or packages,
(ii) If not covered by clause (i) 200 per cent valorem
3. A bare reading indicates that the item covers all sorts of paints, distempers, dyes, colors, enamels and varnishes etc. Learned counsel for the petitioners has attempted to show that the subject goods fall within the expression "colors". The argument is native, to say the least. The expression "colors" has to be interpreted keeping in view the heading of item No. 04.03 namely, "paints, pigments, varnishes and polishes". The edible color is altogether a different species and has no connection whatsoever with paints, pigments, varnishes and polishes.
4. No fault whatsoever can be found in the impugned judgment of the High Court. We hold this petition as frivolous and while refusing leave to appeal, dismiss the same.