Pakistan Case Law
2008 MLD 1491

MANZOOR HUSSAIN vs THE STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2008 MLD 1491
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Revision Application No. 27 of 2008
Date2008-04-27
Judge(s)Khawaja Naveed Ahmed
ResultApplication dismissed
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

Manzoor Hussain filed a Criminal Revision Application against the order of the District and Sessions Judge, Karachi West, which dismissed his application under section 516-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 for the release of two vehicles held up by the police in connection with F.I.R. No.49 of 2008 registered under section 395 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 at Police Station S.I.T.E., Karachi. The core legal question was whether the vehicles, being case property and material evidence while the accused persons were absconding, should be released to the applicant at this stage. The Sindh High Court held that the impugned order of the Sessions Judge was a speaking order and required no interference, noting that releasing the vehicles could hamper the prosecution case. The Court dismissed the revision application while observing that it remained open for the applicant to move a fresh application before the trial court.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether vehicles held as case property in a criminal case can be released under section 516-A, Cr.P.C. while the accused persons are absconding?
  • Does an appellate or revisional court interfere with a speaking order refusing the interim custody of case property when the trial court's assessment is sound?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 516-A, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
  • Section 395, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
criminal revisionsuperdarirelease of vehiclescase propertydacoity

ORDER

1. ' KHAWAJA NAVEED AHMED, J.---Manzoor Hussain has filed this Criminal Revision Application through Mr. Fayaz Ahmed Sammor, Advocate, against the order, dated 8-3-2008 of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Karachi West, on an application moved under section 516-A, Cr.P.C. For release of the vehicles bearing registration No.TKB-800 and ZB-931, held up by the police in case F.I.R. No.49 of 2008, lodged at Police Station S.I.T.E., Karachi, under section 395, P . P. C .

2. ' The learned counsel for the applicant contends that the learned trial Court has wrongly observed in the impugned order that the owner has not cooperated with the police and has not supplied names and addresses of the drivers of the vehicles. The learned counsel further states that vide Roznamcha Entry No.59, dated 1-3-2008 of Police Station S.I.T.E. The applicant has supplied names and addresses of the drivers. On the other hand, the learned A.A.-G, Mr. Arshad Lodhi, has strongly opposed this application and states there is no mention of the addresses in the Roznamcha entry referred to by the learned counsel for the applicant in his arguments. The learned A.A.-G further states that truck is the case property. He further states that the accused persons are absconding and the vehicles are the material piece of evidence in the hands of the prosecution and if the same are released the prosecution case will be hampered.

3. ' I have heard both the learned counsel and have perused the record as well as the Roznamcha entry, mentioned above, I have also perused the order of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Karachi West. The impugned order is a speaking one and does not need any interference. I hereby uphold the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge and dismiss this Criminal Revision Application. However, it will be open for the applicant to move fresh application before the learned trial Court as has been observed by the learned Sessions Judge in his order.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.