MUHAMMAD SHAHID vs THE STATE
This matter arises from a bail application filed by the applicant Muhammad Shahid, who is facing trial in F.I.R. No. 249 of 2007 registered at Police Station S.I.T.E., Karachi, under sections 353, 324 and 34 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860. The core legal question concerns whether the applicant is entitled to post-arrest bail in a case involving a police encounter where the firing by the accused party was ineffective and no injuries were sustained by the police. The court held that since the firing was ineffective and no one from the police side was injured, the case falls within the scope of further inquiry under subsection (2) of section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898. Consequently, the court granted post-arrest bail to the applicant subject to furnishing the requisite surety. The key principle laid down is that where an accused is alleged to have fired at a police party but the firing proves ineffective with no injuries sustained, the matter warrants further inquiry under section 497(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, justifying the grant of bail.
- Is an accused entitled to bail under section 497(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 when firing at a police party is ineffective and causes no injuries?
- Does a police encounter resulting in firearm injuries to the accused and the death of an accomplice warrant further inquiry for the purpose of bail?
- Section 353, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 324, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 34, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 497(2), Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
ORDER
1. ' KHAWAJA NAVEED AHMED, J.---The applicant is facing trial in F.I.R. No,249 of 2007, under sections 353/324/ 34, P.P.C. Registered at S.I.T.E. Police Station, Karachi.
2. ' In this bail application, applicant Muhammad Shahid was arrested in a police encounter that has taken place on 18-6-2007 at 12-30 hours near Ameer Petrol Pump, Fakharuddin G. Ibrahim Valika Road, Karachi. In this encounter, one accomplice of accused, namely, Akbar, had died while Shahid and Muhammad Rahim had received fire-arm injuries. The applicant is in custody since June, 2007.
3. The firing made by the accused upon the police party proved to be ineffective and nobody was injured from the police side. It is a case of ineffective firing as far as the applicant/ accused party is concerned. In the circumstances, I hold this case as one of further inquiry under section 497(2), Cr.P.C. And pending such inquiry, I grant bail to applicant Muhammad Shahid upon his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs,100,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
Cited by 3 cases
- Nakeef son of Suhrab Nindwani vs The State 2020 SHC 1086
- NAKEEF Versus State 2021 YLRN 104
- MUHAMMAD USMAN vs THE STATE 2009 P Cr. L J 359