Pakistan Case Law
2008 CLD 1311

ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK vs LAEEQ AHMED

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2008 CLD 1311
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No,343-K of 2006 Petition No,343-K of 2006
Date2007-04-17
Judge(s)Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi and Ghulam Rabbani
ResultOrder accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a petition filed before the Supreme Court of Pakistan challenging a decree passed by the High Court in a suit titled 'Laeeq Ahmed v. Zarai Taraqiati Bank'. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel stated that a related suit filed by the petitioner against the respondent in the Banking Court at Karachi was near conclusion, and offered not to press the petition if execution of the impugned High Court decree was stayed pending the decision of the Banking Court suit. The respondent's counsel agreed not to seek execution of the decree until the disposal of the Bank's suit. Acting upon the consensus between the parties, the Supreme Court disposed of the petition with a direction that the decree passed in favour of the respondent shall not be executed until the final decision of the suit pending in the Banking Court at Karachi.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can execution of a decree be stayed pending the decision of a related suit in a Banking Court based on a statement made by counsel?
  • Will a petition be not pressed if an agreement is reached between parties regarding the stay of execution of a decree?
banking courtexecution of decreestay of executioncivil petitionsupreme court of pakistan

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset, stated that the proceedings in the suit filed by the petitioner involving the same dispute in the Banking Court at Karachi, is matured for conclusion and if the execution of the decree passed by the High Court in the suit filed by the respondent against the petitioner under challenge before this Court in the present petition, is stayed till the decision of the suit of Bank, he will not press this petition before this Court at this stage. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Laeeq Ahmed, respondent, has stated that respondent will not agitate for the execution of decree pending disposal of the suit filed by the Bank.

2. In view, of the position taken by the learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of this petition with direction that pending final decision of the suit filed by the Bank against the respondent in the Banking Court, at Karachi, the decree passed in the shit titled `Laeeq Ahmed v. Zarai Taraqiati Bank' shall not be executed. This petition is accordingly disposed of.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.