Pakistan Case Law
2009 PTD 1715

Messrs AIDY VEE & CO, (PVT.) LTD. through Director, vs TAXATION OFFICER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE and 4 others

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2009 PTD 1715
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Writ Petition No.7594 of 2009,
Date2009-04-24
Judge(s)Irfan Qadir
ResultOrder Accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter comes before the Lahore High Court via a constitutional petition filed by Messrs Aidy Vee & Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. through its Director against the Taxation Officer of Income Tax, Lahore, and others, concerning coercive recovery proceedings initiated despite the pendency of a tax appeal and an interim relief application before the appellate authority. The core legal question is whether tax recovery proceedings should be stayed when an appeal and an application for interim relief are pending adjudication before the Commissioner Income Tax Appeals and remain undecided. The Court held that respondents shall not effect the impugned recovery until the pending interim relief application or the main appeal is finally decided, directing the Commissioner Income Tax Appeals to decide the appeal preferably within two months. The key principle laid down is that recovery proceedings ought to be restrained during the pendency of an undecided interim relief application before the appellate forum to prevent rendering the statutory appeal infructuous.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether recovery proceedings can be pursued while an appeal is pending before the Commissioner Income Tax Appeals?
  • Should tax recovery be stayed when an application for interim relief is pending adjudication?
  • Can coercive recovery be effected before the decision on an interim relief application by the appellate authority?
constitutional petitionrecovery proceedingsincome tax appealinterim reliefstay of recoverytaxation

ORDER

1. IRFAN QADIR, J.---Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that notwithstanding the pendency of his appeal, the respondents are going ahead with the recovery proceedings. According to the learned counsel the entire process of filing of this appeal would be rendered infructuous in case the impugned recovery proceedings are not, stayed especially when the appeal of the petitioner is pending adjudication before the Commissioner Income Tax Appeals. It is further stated that an application for interim relief is also pending adjudication before the Commissioner Income Tax Appeals the same is not being decided.

2. ' In case such an application is pending respondent shall not effect the impugned recovery till the application for interim relief, or appeal in question is finally decided. The Commissioner Income Tax Appeals is expected to decide the appeal of the petitioner at his earliest convenience preferably within next 2 months. The instant writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Cited by 5 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.