TALAT HAMID NIAZI vs SECRETARY EDUCATION, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND OTHERS

M. SALEEM CHAUDHRY (CHAIRMAN).-----In this case, the learned counsel for the appellant has adequately explained the reasons for non-appearance in this Court, by him on 28-5-1979. We accordingly direct that this appeal may be restored to its original number.

2. However, on merits, we find that to start with the order of refusal of allowing to cross the Efficiency Bar by the appellant was supported b A the relevant adverse entries in the Annual Confidential Reports of the appellant. After the introduction of National Pay Scales in the year 1972, the appellant's pay was fixed in the scale admissible to her in which there was as yet no stage for crossing of Efficiency Bar. Thus the appellant had no grievance in this behalf.

3. Consequently, the appeal has no merit and is dismissed accordingly. However, there will be no order as to costs.