MUHAMMAD ISSA vs THE STATE
This matter arose from a post-arrest bail application filed by the accused in FIR Crime No. 96 of 2008. The legal issue concerned whether the accused was entitled to post-arrest bail considering the specific role assigned to him and the nature of the injury under the relevant penal provisions. The High Court observed that according to the F.I.R., the applicant inflicted a hatchet blow to the complainant's head, which was classified in the medical certificate as Shajjah-i-Madihah under Section 337-A(ii) of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860, carrying a maximum sentence of five years' imprisonment. The Court held that the alleged offense did not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898. Consequently, the High Court granted bail to the applicant subject to furnishing a surety bond. The judgment establishes that where an injury caused by an accused attracts a punishment that does not fall under the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C., post-arrest bail may be granted.
- Does an offense under Section 337-A(ii) of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898?
- Is an accused entitled to post-arrest bail when the offense charged carries a maximum punishment of five years' imprisonment?
- Section 337-A(ii), Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 497, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
ORDER
1. ' FARRUKH ZIA G. SHAIKH, J.---On perusal of F.I.R. Crime No,96 of 2008 it is apparent that accused Muhammad Essa at the first instance gave hatchet blow form the right side to the head of the complainant with intention to kill him. This point is admitted by the learned counsel for the accused. The medical certificate, dated 3-8-2008 shows that injury No,1 should be treated as Shujjah-i-Madihah. Section 337-A(ii) states that Shajjah-i-Madihah carries an imprisonment for five years. The specific role assigned to the accused in the F.I.R does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied on PLD 1995 SC 34, 1996 PCr.LJ 1612 and 2002 PCr.LJ 582.
2. ' Under the circumstances bail is granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs,2,00,000 to the satisfaction of the Additional Registrar of this Court.
Cited by 4 cases
- Nawab Ali and 8 others vs State PLJ 2020 Cr.C. (Karachi) 1537
- Nawab Ali and others vs State PLJ 2020 Cr.C. (Karachi) 1319
- ASLAM Versus State 2020 YLRN 142
- Sikandar Ali Versus State 2025 YLR 1959