Pakistan Case Law
2009 MLD 21

MUHAMMAD ISSA vs THE STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2009 MLD 21
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Bail Application No,611 and M.A. No, 2541 of 2008
Date2008-10-20
Judge(s)Farrukh Zia G. Shaikh
ResultBail granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arose from a post-arrest bail application filed by the accused in FIR Crime No. 96 of 2008. The legal issue concerned whether the accused was entitled to post-arrest bail considering the specific role assigned to him and the nature of the injury under the relevant penal provisions. The High Court observed that according to the F.I.R., the applicant inflicted a hatchet blow to the complainant's head, which was classified in the medical certificate as Shajjah-i-Madihah under Section 337-A(ii) of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860, carrying a maximum sentence of five years' imprisonment. The Court held that the alleged offense did not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898. Consequently, the High Court granted bail to the applicant subject to furnishing a surety bond. The judgment establishes that where an injury caused by an accused attracts a punishment that does not fall under the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C., post-arrest bail may be granted.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does an offense under Section 337-A(ii) of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898?
  • Is an accused entitled to post-arrest bail when the offense charged carries a maximum punishment of five years' imprisonment?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 337-A(ii), Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 497, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
post-arrest bailprohibitory clauseShajjah-i-Madihahhatchet injurymedical certificatesurety bond

ORDER

1. ' FARRUKH ZIA G. SHAIKH, J.---On perusal of F.I.R. Crime No,96 of 2008 it is apparent that accused Muhammad Essa at the first instance gave hatchet blow form the right side to the head of the complainant with intention to kill him. This point is admitted by the learned counsel for the accused. The medical certificate, dated 3-8-2008 shows that injury No,1 should be treated as Shujjah-i-Madihah. Section 337-A(ii) states that Shajjah-i-Madihah carries an imprisonment for five years. The specific role assigned to the accused in the F.I.R does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied on PLD 1995 SC 34, 1996 PCr.LJ 1612 and 2002 PCr.LJ 582.

2. ' Under the circumstances bail is granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs,2,00,000 to the satisfaction of the Additional Registrar of this Court.

Cited by 4 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.