MUHAMMAD JAVAID GHANI vs THE STATE
This matter concerns a post-arrest bail application filed by the petitioner, Muhammad Javaid Ghani, who was charged under Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 in connection with F.I.R. No. 1055/2008. The allegation against the petitioner involved the issuance of a cheque for Rs. 1,200,000 which was subsequently dishonoured. The petitioner's initial bail application was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Lahore, leading to the current petition before the High Court. The core legal question was whether the petitioner was entitled to the grant of post-arrest bail given the nature of the offence and the status of the investigation. Upon review, the Court held that the offence charged did not fall within the prohibitory clause of the relevant law. Furthermore, the Court noted that the petitioner was no longer required for the purposes of investigation. Consequently, the Court accepted the petition and granted bail to the petitioner, subject to the furnishing of a surety bond. The judgment reinforces the principle that bail is generally granted when an offence falls outside the prohibitory clause and custodial interrogation is no longer necessary.
- Is an accused entitled to post-arrest bail if the alleged offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause?
- Does the completion of investigation justify the grant of bail to an accused?
- Section 489-F, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
ORDER
' RANA ZAHID MAHMOOD, J.---Post arrest bail application in case F.I.R. No, 1055/2008 dated 31-12- 2008 under section 489-F P.P.C. Registered with Police Station Shalimar, Lahore wherein it is alleged that petitioner gave a cheque of Rs,12,00,000 dated 27-10-2008 of Muslim Commercial Bank Limited Beedan Road, Lahore Branch to the complainant, however the same was dishonoured, hence this case. After arrest bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by learned Addl: Sessions Judge, Lahore vide order dated 30-1-2009, hence this petition to this Court.
2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Deputy Prosecutor General assisted by learned counsel for the complainant, I am of the view that since offence does not fall within prohibitory clause and petitioner is no more required for investigation. The petition is, therefore, accepted and the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs,100,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
Cited by 1 case
- Ghulam Murtaza vs The State 2013 YLR 566, 2013 P.C.T.LR. 626