MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE vs CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1 and 6
This criminal miscellaneous application was filed to challenge the initiation of criminal proceedings against the applicant under Section 182 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860. The matter arose after an F.I.R. lodged by the applicant was disposed of in 'B' Class by the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, who subsequently ordered the prosecution of the complainant (applicant) for filing a false complaint. The core legal question was whether the trial court was justified in initiating proceedings against the complainant under Section 182 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 following the disposal of the F.I.R. in 'B' Class. The High Court held that the proceedings against the applicant were not sustainable under the law. Consequently, the court allowed the application and quashed the pending proceedings against the applicant. The key principle laid down is that the mere disposal of an F.I.R. in 'B' Class does not automatically warrant the initiation of criminal proceedings against the complainant under Section 182 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860, and such proceedings may be quashed if they lack legal justification.
- Can criminal proceedings under Section 182 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 be initiated solely because an F.I.R. was disposed of in 'B' Class?
- Is the High Court empowered to quash trial court proceedings that lack legal justification?
- Section 182, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 365-B, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 392, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
ORDER
1. ' GHULAM SARWAR KORAI, J.---Present applicant lodged F.I.R. No,181 of 2008 and same was disposed of in "B" Class vide order dated 12-1-2009 passed by the learned Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate No,1, Hala and complainant was ordered to be prosecuted under section 182 P.P.C, in compliance of this order a report was filed by the S.H.O, Police Station, Hala and thereafter proceedings against the applicant were initiated in the Court of Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate No,1, Hala. Learned counsel for the applicant states that he will be satisfied if the proceedings against the applicant before learned trial Court are quashed. Though the F.I.R. No,181/2008 under sections 365-B & 392 P.P.C. Of PS Hala was not proved during investigation and the same was disposed of in "B" Class but taking action against the applicant and proceedings under section 182 Cr.P.C. Could not be required under the law. I allow this criminal miscellaneous application and quash the proceedings No,2/2009 pending against the applicant in the Coot of learned Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate No,1, Hala on the report of S.H.O. Police Station, Hala.
Cited by 1 case
- SHAMSHAD ALI Versus State 2017 YLRN 287