Syeda WAJIHA HARIS vs CHAIRMAN, UNION COUNCIL NO,7, LAHORE
This constitutional petition was filed against a notice issued by a Union Council Chairman in Lahore regarding a divorce notice and reconciliation proceedings under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, where both spouses resided in Romania. The core legal issue was whether a Union Council Chairman in Pakistan has jurisdiction to conduct reconciliation proceedings for overseas Pakistanis when a specific statutory mechanism exists abroad. The Lahore High Court held that S.R.O. No.1086(K)/61 empowers the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to appoint officers of Pakistan Missions abroad to exercise the functions of the Chairman under the Ordinance. The Court established that for Pakistani residents abroad, the proper statutory remedy and forum for reconciliation lies with the Pakistani Mission in their country of residence. Consequently, the proceedings initiated before the Union Council Chairman in Pakistan were declared incompetent and illegal, and the respondent husband was directed to approach the Pakistan Mission in Romania.
- Which forum holds jurisdiction to conduct reconciliation proceedings under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 when both spouses reside abroad?
- Can a Union Council Chairman in Pakistan conduct divorce reconciliation proceedings for Pakistanis residing in a foreign country?
- Are officers of Pakistan Missions abroad authorized to perform the functions of a Union Council Chairman under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961?
- Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961
- S.R.O. No.1086(K)/61
ORDER
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, J.---This petition is directed against notice received by the petitioner from respondent No,1, Chairman U.C. Informing her about the notice of divorce served by respondent No,2, husband of the petitioner and offering reconciliation proceedings under, the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961. ("Ordinance"). Both the petitioner and respondent No,2 are residing in Romania. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that "S.R.O. No,1086(K)/61, dated 8-11-1961 empowers Ministry of Foreign Affairs to appoint officers of Pakistan Mission abroad to discharge functions of Chairman under the aforesaid Ordinance". Learned counsel for respondent No,2 submits that the respondent No,2 has written to the Pakistanis Mission in Bucharest Romania informing them about the divorce pronounced by him. It is obvious that for foreign resident Pakistani the law has created a remedy and forum for reconciliation between the spouses under the Ordinance in the Pakistan missions in the countries of their residence. In the first instance, the respondent No,2 should avail that remedy. In case such remedy is not available then any other competent forum may be approached by him for. Relief.
2. Accordingly, it is directed that the respondent No,2 shall approach the Pakistan Mission in Romania to register the divorce pronounced by him upon the petitioner and for reconciliation proceedings visualized under the Ordinance to be undertaken there. As a consequence the proceedings before the respondent No,1 are declared to be incompetent and therefore illegal. Writ petition is accordingly allowed.
Cited by 10 cases
- Zeeshan Razzak vs Cantonment Board Clifton & others 2025 SHC KHI 1853
- Zeeshan Razzak Versus Cantonment Board Clifton 2026 MLD 347
- Muhammad Adil Nawaz Bhatti vs Chairman Union Council and others 2024 LHC 538, 2024 PLJ Lahore 214, 2025 PLD Lahore 340
- MUHAMMAD ADIL NAWAZ BHATTI Versus CHAIRMAN UNION COUNCIL NO. 116-EME 2025 PLD 340
- Dr. Hassan Shahryar vs Sana Waqar through authorized attorney and 2 2023 CLC 2025
- Dr. Hassan Shahryar vs Sana Waqar and 2 others 2022 LHC 7304
- Muhammad Akram Nadeem vs Chairman, Arbitration Council/ADLG 2021 IHC 132
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM NADEEM Versus CHAIRMAN, ARBITRATION COUNCIL/ADLG, ISLAMABAD 2021 CLC 1947
- Ms. SADAF MUNIR KHAN vs CHAIRMAN, RECONCILIATION COMMITTEE and 2 2019 PLD Lahore 285
- Mst. SANA ASIM HAFEEZ vs ADMINISTRATOR/CHAIRMAN, ARBITRATION AND 2016 MLD 1061