Malik ZAHEER AHMAD vs THE STATE And Another
This criminal revision petition is directed against the order of the Sessions Judge, Islamabad, whereby an application for the consolidation of two separate criminal cases—one pending trial before an Additional Sessions Judge under Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860, and another pending before an Illaqa Magistrate under Sections 420, 468, and 471 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860—was accepted and the case before the Magistrate was withdrawn and transferred to the Additional Sessions Judge for joint trial. The core legal question was whether a Sessions Judge has the legal authority to withdraw a case from the court of a Magistrate and entrust it to an Additional Sessions Judge. The Islamabad High Court held that while a Sessions Judge has the power under Section 528(1)(C) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 to withdraw a case from one Magistrate and transfer it to another Magistrate, that power does not extend to transferring a case from a Magistrate to an Additional Sessions Judge. Consequently, the High Court set aside the impugned order of consolidation and directed that the subsequent case be sent back to the court of the Illaqa Magistrate for further proceedings in accordance with the law.
- Whether a Sessions Judge can withdraw a case from the court of a Magistrate and entrust it to the court of an Additional Sessions Judge?
- What is the scope of a Sessions Judge's power under Section 528(1)(C) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 regarding the transfer of cases?
- Can two separate criminal cases pending before different tiers of courts be consolidated and tried together by an Additional Sessions Judge?
- Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 420, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 468, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 471, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 435, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
- Section 439-A, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
- Section 561-A, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
- Section 528(1)(C), Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
JUDGMENT RIAZ AHMAD KHAN, J.---This order is directed to dispose of Criminal Revisoin No.9 of 2011.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on The complaint of Zameer-ul-Hassan respondent No.2, case F.I.R. No.256 Police Station Tarnol was registered on 20-12-2007. On the basis of said F.I.R., three persons namely Saeed Akhtar, Muhammad Hanif and Muhammad Zaheer were charged for murder of Puma Shah. One Abdul Aziz was charged for instigation as according to F.I.R. On his instigation the murder had been committed. Accused Abdul Aziz was granted bail on the basis of plea of alibi. According to the petitioner in order to establish plea of alibi the said Abdul Aziz had prepared a fake and fictitious document, so another F.I.R. Under sections 420, 468, 47], P.P.C. Was registered against him as well as other accused. The case F.I.R. Under section 302, P.P.C. Was pending trial in the court of Additional Sessions Judge Islamabad whereas the second case regarding subsequent F.I.R. Under sections 420, 468 and 471, P.P.C. Was pending trial before the Illaqa Magistrate Police Station Tarnol. Respondent No. 2 Zameer-ul-Hassan, complainant in first F.I.R. Regarding murder, submitted application before the learned Sessions Judge, Islamabad for consolidation of two cases and trial of two cases by one Court. The said application was accepted by the learned Sessions Judge, Islamabad vide order dated 3-12-2010. The case pending before the Illaqa Magistrate was withdrawn and sent to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Islamabad for disposal. Feeling aggrieved of the said order, the present revision petition under sections 435/439- A read with section 561-A, Cr.P.C. Has been filed.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the record.
4. There is no cavil to the proposition that Sessions Judge has power to withdraw the ease from the court of one Magistrate and transfer it to the court of another Magistrate. However, this power is available to the Sessions Judge under section 528(1)(C) of Criminal Procedure B Code. In exercise of this power, the Sessions Judge cannot withdraw the case from the court of Magistrate and entrust it to the court of Additional Sessions Judge. If the case is withdrawn from the court of one Magistrate it can be entrusted to another Magistrate. In the present case, the case pending before the Illaqa Magistrate has been entrusted to the Additional Sessions Judge; therefore, order is against the law. This revision petition is - accordingly accepted and the impugned order is set aside. The case F.I.R. No.132, Police Station Tarnol under sections 420/468/471, P.P.C. Be withdrawn from the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Islamabad and sent back to the court of Illaqa Magistrate for further proceedings in accordance with law..