Pakistan Case Law
2011 PLC (C.S.) 977

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE and others s vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2011 PLC (C.S.) 977
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeals Nos.184-K to 187-K, 190-K and 212-K of
Date2010-09-24
Judge(s)Jawwad S. Khawaja, Anwar Zaheer Jamali and Khilji Arif Hussain
ResultLeave granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a petition for leave to appeal filed by employees of the National Logistic Cell seeking to invoke the jurisdiction of the Federal Service Tribunal. The core legal question is whether employees of the National Logistic Cell are entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of the Federal Service Tribunal, considering whether the National Logistic Cell is an entity established and operated by the Federal Government. The court granted leave to appeal, holding prima facie that the Federal Service Tribunal failed to take into account the governmental status of the National Logistic Cell in determining its jurisdiction. The key principle laid down is that entities established and operated by the Federal Government bring their employees within the purview of the service tribunal's jurisdiction.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether employees of the National Logistic Cell are entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of the Federal Service Tribunal?
  • Is the National Logistic Cell an entity established and operated by the Federal Government?
service tribunalleave to appealNational Logistic Celljurisdictionfederal employees

ORDER

1. The petitioners have made submissions in person. It does prima facie, appear that the learned Federal Service Tribunal did not take into account the fact that the National Logistic Cell ('NLC') was very much an entity established and operated by the Federal Government and, therefore, the petitioners, who were employees of NLC, were entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of the Federal Service Tribunal.

2. ' Leave to appeal is, therefore, granted in these cases to consider the above matter.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.