REHMATULLAH vs THE STATE and another
This petition for leave to appeal was filed against an order of the Lahore High Court which cancelled the bail previously granted to the petitioner by the Additional Sessions Judge in a murder case registered under Sections 302/34 PPC. The core legal question was whether the High Court was justified in cancelling bail at a stage when the trial was nearing conclusion. The Supreme Court observed that the trial was at the verge of completion, with only one or two witnesses remaining to be examined. The Court held that, as a matter of settled law, courts should generally refrain from granting or cancelling bail when a trial is in progress. Instead, the appropriate course of action is to direct the trial court to conclude the proceedings within a specified timeframe. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, converted the petition into an appeal, and confirmed the bail while directing the trial court to conclude the case within two months.
- sections 302/34, P.P.C.
ORDER
' MIAN HAMID FAROOQ, J.---Petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the order dated 19-3-2009, whereby learned Lahore High Court, Lahore accepted respondents' application (Criminal Miscellaneous No,11774-BC of 2008) and cancelled the bail granted to the petitioner by learned Additional. Sessions Judge, Khushab in a case registered vide F.I.R. No, 524 of 2008 for the offences under sections 302/34, P.P.C.
2. Learned counsel has reiterated the contentions noted in the order dated 6-4-2009, passed by this court. Learned counsel for the respondents, while relying upon Muhammad Hanif v. Shafqat Nazir and others (2007 SCM R 1857) and Mst. Qudrat Bibi v. Muhammad Iqbal and another (2003 SCM R 68), supported the order of the learned High Court and stated that bail granted to the petitioner was rightly cancelled by the learned High Court as specific shot was tired by him and there was sufficient evidence to connect the petitioner with the commission of offence. Learned A.P.-G. Has submitted that the trial is in progress and one or two witnesses are remained to be examined.
3. Heard. The petitioner was granted bail on 21-11-200$, which was cancelled by the learned High Court on 19-3-2009, when according to the order itself the trial was at the verge of conclusion.
Learned Additional Prosecutor-General stated that now only one or two witnesses are yet to be recorded. The courts should not grant or cancel bail when the trial is in progress and proper course for the courts in such a situation would be to direct the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the case within a specified period. Reference may be made to Haji Mian Abdul Rafique v. Riaz ud Din and another (2008 SCM R 1206). We find that the impugned order was passed in violation of the law, therefore, we cannot subscribe to it. In view whereof, we are persuaded to allow this petition and direct the learned trial Court to conclude the trial of the case expeditiously.
4. For the foregoing reasons, present petition is converted into appeal, allowed and bail granting order dated 6-4-2009, passed by this court, is confirmed. However, learned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial of the case within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Cited by 38 cases
- Sahibzada Noor Ul Amin vs The State and another 2025 PHC 262
- Makhdoom Haider Shah vs Mustafa Haider Shah and another 2025 MLD 397
- Sarfraz alias Faraz and others vs The State and others 2024 SHC 396, 2024 PLC (C.S.) 934
- Muhammad Haseeb vs State and another PLJ 2024 Cr.C. 805, 2024 PCRLJ 1462
- Ateeq Ahmed Khan S/O Shamim Ahmed Khan vs The State 2023 SHC 888
- Salman Khan vs The State & another 2023 PHC 165, 2024 MLD 392
- Salman Ahmad vs Syed Ali Raza Naqvi and another 2022 MLD 1342
- Javed Ali Shaikh vs The State and others 2022 SHC 236
- Shams Ur Rehman vs The State and another 2024 YLR 978
- ROHAN AHMAD Versus State 2022 PCrLJ 259
- Ali Shan vs The State 2021 IHC 212
- Muhammad Sajjad vs The State 2021 IHC 214
- Muhammad Ali vs The State and another 2022 MLD 312
- Hamza Sadaqat vs The State and another 2022 YLR 1024
- Nazar Muhammad vs The State 2021 IHC 148
- Dawa Jan vs The State, etc 2021 IHC 142
- Afaq Ali vs The State 2021 IHC 100
- Abbas Ahmed vs The State 2021 IHC 28
- Abdul Qudoos vs The State 2021 SHC 258
- Badaruddin vs The State 2021 SHC 246
- Indrais vs The State 2021 SHC 152
- M. Faizan vs The State 2021 SHC 166
- ABDUL RAHEEM SHAH Versus State 2021 MLD 2000
- Irfan Afridee vs State PLJ 2021 Cr.C. (Islamabad) 50
- Sohail Akhter vs The State 2021 MLD 549
- NAZEER Versus State 2020 PCrLJN 85
- SAMEEN ASGHAR Versus State 2019 YLRN 70
- TARIQ KHAN Versus State 2019 YLRN 72
- Syed SHOAIB HASSAN and others vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others 2019 YLR 2162
- ALLAH BACHAYO KHASKHELI vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman 2019 MLD 814
- WASEEM IQBAL Versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB) 2018 PCrLJN 212
- Faiq Ali and others vs Federation Of Pakistan and others 2021 YLR 1406
- Raja MUHAMMAD RIZWAN Versus State 2017 MLD 1522
- ABDUL LATEEF Versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU ISLAMABAD 2017 PCrLJN 254
- RASHID ALI Versus State 2013 PCrLJ 297
- M. IQBAL BUTT vs STATE & 3 others PLJ 2012 Cr.C. (Lahore) 741
- M. IQBAL BUTT Versus State 2012 PCrLJ 1350
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM Versus NAZAR KHAN 2012 SCMR 138