JAMALUDDIN alias ZUBAIR KHAN vs THE STATE
This petition for leave to appeal was filed against the Peshawar High Court's decision to decline bail to the petitioner in a narcotics case involving the recovery of four kilograms of charas. The petitioner contended that the substance was recovered from a path rather than his personal possession and argued that the likely sentence would not reach the statutory maximum. The State opposed bail on the grounds that the petitioner was a habitual offender involved in two similar cases. The Supreme Court observed that when considering bail, courts must look at the sentence likely to be awarded based on the specific facts and circumstances rather than the maximum statutory penalty. The Court further noted that the petitioner's three-month incarceration without the commencement of trial favored the grant of bail. Regarding the petitioner's criminal history, the Court held that prior involvement in similar cases does not bar bail if no conviction has been recorded. Consequently, the petition was converted into an appeal and bail was granted.
- F.I.R. No.326
ORDER
' EJAZ AFZAL KHAN, J.---This petition for leave to appeal arises out of judgment dated 31-10-2011 of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar whereby the petitioner was declined bail in case F.I.R. No,326 dated 9-10-2010 of Police Station Tal Hangu.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contended that the incriminating substance was picked up from the path and not recovered from the personal possession of the petitioner; that even if it is presumed that it was recovered from his personal possession, he is not likely to be awarded maximum sentence provided by the Statute for four kilograms of charas and that he has been in jail ever since 6-9-2011, yet, commencement of his trial let alone its conclusion is not in sight; therefore, he deserves the concession of bail.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of State argued that petitioner is a habitual offender as he has been charged in two other cases of similar nature, therefore he does not deserve concession of bail as it would encourage him to repeat the crime in future.
4. Without entering into the merits of the case, as the quantum of sentence has to be commensurate with the quantum of substance recovered, we doubt the petitioner can be awarded maximum sentence provided by the Statute. Needless to say that the Court while hearing, a petition for bail is not to keep in view the maximum sentence provided by the Statute but the one which is likely to be entailed in the facts and circumstances of the case. The fact that petitioner has been in jail for three months yet commencement of his trial let alone its conclusion is not in sight, would also tilt the scales of justice in favour of bail rather than jail.
5. The argument that the petitioner has been involved in two other cases of similar nature would not come in the way of grant of petition so along as there is nothing on the record to show that he has been convicted in any one of them. We, therefore, convert this petition into appeal and allow it.
The appellant shall be released on bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,200,000 (Rupees two lacs) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
Cited by 50 cases
- JABRAN Versus State 2025 SCMR 1099
- Barkat ullah Versus State 2025 PCrLJ 994
- Hazrat Khan vs The State 2025 MLD 173
- Hazrat Khan Versus State 2025 MLD 173
- Talha Samoo S/O Ghulam Nabi vs The State 2024 SHC 806
- Zahoor Ahmed S/O Umer Khan & 02 Ors vs The State 2024 SHC 738
- Muhammad Khan S/o Abdul Majeed vs The State 2024 SHC 728
- Barkat Ullah vs The State & another 2024 IHC 250, 2025 PCRLJ 994
- Muhammad Waseem Mughal vs The State through Advocate-General of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad 2023 PLD High Court (AJK) 11
- Muhammad Ismail vs The State 2023 YLR 1291
- Mst. Ayesha Anwar vs The State and another 2022 MLD 444
- Hamdullah vs The State 2022 MLD 998
- Nazar Muhammad vs The State 2021 IHC 148
- Sunny Abbas vs State and another PLJ 2021 Cr.C. (Lahore) 749
- Muhammad Noman Khan vs The State and another 2022 YLR 1368
- Muhammad Tahir Bashir vs State and another PLJ 2021 Cr.C. (Islamabad) 204
- Jalal @ Babu vs The State 2020 SHC 652
- Asif Ali vs The State 2020 SHC 570
- Rahim Bakhsh vs The State 2021 MLD 553
- Professor Akhtar Khan vs The State 2021 P Cr. L J 506, PLJ 2020 Cr.C. (Peshawar) 1247, 2020 PHC 72
- Rana Sanaullah Khan vs The State and another PLJ 2020 Cr.C. (Lahore) 300, 2019 LHC 4122
- MANZOOR HUSSAIN MAGSI Versus State 2023 PCrLJN 18
- SAIFULLAH vs STATE & another PLJ 2020 Cr.C. (Lahore) 283
- ABDUL RAHEEM vs The STATE 2019 MLD 1929
- MUHAMMAD BASHIR AHMAD vs STATE, etc PLJ 2019 Cr.C. 1392
- MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN alias CHOTO Versus State 2020 YLRN 45
- Muhammad Rafique alias Mamun vs State etc PLJ 2021 Cr.C. 1447
- GHULAM HUSSAIN alias Bau alias Chuhi vs STATE and another PLJ 2019 Cr.C. 1043
- NADEEM ASLAM vs The STATE and another 2019 YLR 415
- Momin Shah vs The State 2018 PHC 1420
- MOMIN SHAH Versus State 2018 PCrLJN 157
- ZAIB KHAN Versus State 2018 PCrLJN 145
- ARIF GUL Versus State 2018 PCrLJN 82
- JAN MUHAMMAD alias JANU vs The STATE 2018 YLR 190
- SHAHZAD Versus State 2017 YLRN 165
- KASHIF KHAN Versus State 2017 YLRN 440
- SABAR SHAH Versus State 2017 PCrLJN 99
- NAZEER HUSSAIN Versus State 2018 YLRN 132
- PERVEZ alias PEHALWAN Versus State 2017 YLRN 293
- IMDAD HUSSAIN Versus State 2017 PCrLJN 13
- SUBHAN ALI alias BADSHAH Versus State 2017 YLRN 285
- MUHAMMAD YOUNIS Versus State M. Ajmal Aadal , Ch. Muhammad Akram Tahir 2016 PCrLJ 1718
- DIN MUHAMMAD Versus State 2016 YLRN 140
- NIZAMUDDIN alias NIZAM Versus State 2016 PCrLJN 101
- PATHAN KHOKHAR vs The STATE 2016 YLR 359
- MUMTAZ ALI Versus State 2016 PCrLJN 19
- SOCHA GUL Versus State 2015 SCMR 1077
- SHAN vs The STATE 2015 P Cr. L J 747
- NABI GUL vs The STATE 2013 P Cr. L J 735
- Muhammad Faisal vs State