Ch. NASIR IQBAL and others vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary
This matter arises from constitutional petitions pending since 2011 regarding the facilitation of voting rights for Overseas Pakistanis. The core legal question addressed is whether the difficulties cited by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) regarding extending the right of franchise to overseas citizens are insurmountable. The Supreme Court held that the difficulties identified by the ECP—concerning legislative amendments, MOUs, software availability, and voter identification—are not insurmountable and can be resolved through coordinated efforts among relevant state institutions including the ECP, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, and NADRA. The key principle laid down is that state authorities must make all possible coordinated efforts to ensure the fundamental right of overseas citizens to participate in national and provincial elections.
- Whether the difficulties cited by the Election Commission of Pakistan in extending voting rights to Overseas Pakistanis are insurmountable?
- Can temporary legislation under Article 89 of the Constitution of Pakistan be used to enact necessary amendments during the functioning of an interim Government?
- Does the ECP along with relevant state authorities have a duty to ensure the participation of Overseas Pakistanis in national and provincial elections?
- Article 89, Constitution of Pakistan 1973
- Representation of the People Act, 1976
ORDER
' In response to our order dated 19-3-2013, reply (C.M.A. No,1584 of 2013) has been submitted to the proposal pointed out by the Court, perusal whereof indicates that the alleged difficulties/problems highlighted by the ECP mainly relate to three areas:-- ' Firstly, amendment in the Representation of the People Act, 1976 and signing of MOUs with the countries where ECP proposed to extend the facility of voting to Overseas Pakistanis on the plea that in some of the countries such congregations are prohibited. Attending to this aspect of the case, we observe that as at present interim Government is functioning, the amendments so desired or required can be made by adhering to the procedure of temporary legislation, as provided under Article 89 of the Constitution. So far as signing of MOUs is concerned, no law has been cited, however, in this behalf if need be, the ECP can solicit opinion from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; ' Secondly, the issue of non-availability of software, which shall he used by the Overseas Pakistanis for the purpose of extending facility/benefit to cast their votes and if the Ministry of I.T. Is taken into confidence or independently the I.T. Experts are engaged with the mandate to prepare such software under the instruments as early as possible but in any case much before the date of polling this difficulty can also be overcome; and ' Thirdly, the issue of identification of the voters/electors who are living in different countries. Again this issue relates to NADRA and on ,taking on board the authorities of NADRA, the issue being faced by the ECP can conveniently be resolved.
2. We are constrained to observe that these petitions are pending since 2011 onward and much time has already been given to the ECP to do the needful, but so far no progress in this behalf has been made except analyzing suggestions which were put forward by the Court itself and offering explanation to convince the Court that extending the right of franchise to the Overseas Pakistani Citizens is not possible this time but we are not persuaded because as has been observed time and again that these difficulties are not insurmountable and could conveniently be sowed within a shortest possible time if there is a coordinated effort between the ECP, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, NADRA and other authorities relevant in this behalf in order to achieve the object and all possible efforts must be made to allow an opportunity to the Overseas Pakistanis so they may participate in the election of their representatives in National and Provincial Assemblies.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that he has been informed by the learned Attorney- General for Pakistan that the process of extending the facility of exercising the right to vote by the Overseas Pakistanis is possible but as the Attorney-General is appearing before another Bench of this Court, therefore, we direct that let a meeting be convened in the office of the learned Attorney General on 28-3-2013, which shall be attended by the Incharge Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice, the Secretary Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Secretary Ministry of I.T. Chairman NADRA as well as the Representative of ECP and they should thoroughly deliberate and submit comprehensive report on 29-3-2013 and further orders, if required will be passed by this Court to ensure the fundamental right of the Overseas Pakistanis to participate in the formation of Federal and Provincial Government(s), which shall be responsible ultimately for good governance as well as for protection of their life and property.
4. Adjourned to 29-3-2013.
Cited by 5 cases
- Reference by the President of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, under 2021 KLR Supreme Court Cases 104, 2021 PLD Supreme Court 480, PLJ 2021
- Reference No. 1 Of 2020: In the matter of vs N/A 2021 PLD Supreme Court 825
- Muhammad Hanif Abbasi vs Imran Khan Niazi and others 2017 SCP 4001
- Muhammad Hanif Abbasi vs Imran Khan Niazi and others 2018 P.S.C. 41
- MUHAMMAD HANIF ABBAST vs IMRAN KHAN NIAZI and others 2018 PLD Supreme Court 189