DOSSANI TRAVELS PVT. LTD. and 4 others/s vs Messrs TRAVELS SHOP (PVT.)
This matter involves several civil appeals and petitions challenging a High Court order that intervened in the Hajj Policy framed by the Ministry of Religious Affairs. The core legal question was whether the High Court, in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199, could substitute the executive's policy criteria for Hajj Group Organizers with a bidding process. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, declaring the High Court's order violative of the principle of trichotomy of powers. The Court held that while the High Court can annul executive policies if they are unconstitutional, illegal, or mala fide, it cannot interfere in the executive's policy-making domain or substitute its own criteria without evidence of such infirmities. The Court further noted that the High Court failed to hear the affected Hajj Group Organizers who had already been allocated quotas. The Ministry of Religious Affairs was directed to continue regulating Hajj operations through a fair and transparent policy in accordance with future guidelines to be issued by the Supreme Court.
- Article 199 of the Constitution
ORDER
1. ' For reasons to be recorded later in the detailed judgment, Civil Appeals Nos, 800-L to 802-L/2013 are allowed, Civil Petitions Nos,1148 and 1348 of 2013 are converted into appeals and allowed and C.M.As. Nos,278-L, 279-L/2013, 285-L/2013, 289-L/2013, 5328 to 5333/2013, 5378/2013, 5463/2013, 5464/2013 and 5477/2013 are disposed of and we hold and declare as under:--
(i) that the order of the learned High Court dated 24-6-2013 passed in Writ Petition No,7253 of 2013 is violative of the principle of trichotomy of powers, which is one of the foundational principles of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan;
(ii) that it is not the function of the High Court exercising jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution to interfere, in the Policy Making Domain of the Executive;
(iii) that the learned High Court in the exercise of its Constitutional jurisdiction directed selection of Hajj Group Organizers through bidding process and thereby substituted the criterion laid down in the Hajj Policy framed by the Ministry of Religious Affairs without hearing the appellants/Hajj Group Organizers and others who had already been allocated quota and had made arrangements for intending Hujjaj, which is not tenable in law;
(iv) that the High Court can under Article 199 of the Constitution annul an order or a Policy framed by the Executive, if it is violative of the Constitution, law or is product of mala fides. However, nothing has been placed before this Court to indicate that the Hajj Policy challenged before this Court seriously suffered from any of these infirmities; and
(v) that Ministry of Religious Affairs shall continue to regulate the operation of Hajj i,e, enrollment, registration and allocation of quota every year in the light of a fair and transparent policy and the guidelines to be laid down by this Court in the detailed judgment.
Cited by 25 cases
- Faisal Irshad vs Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony, Islamabad and another 2025 CLC 983
- Sheeraz Khan and another vs Deputy Commissioner, Chakwal and 3 others 2022 MLD 1267
- Bahadur Khan vs The Vice-Chancellor, Balochistan University Of Medical 2021 PLD Balochistan 84
- Islamabad Marquees, Catering and Banquet Hall Association vs Federation of Pakistan, etc 2020 IHC 162
- Islamabad Marquees, Catering And Banquet Hall Association (IMCBA) 2021 MLD 235
- Zaigham Abbas and 10 others vs Federation Of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of OP and HRD and 14 others 2021 PLC (C.S.) 486
- Asmatullah Janejo vs Federation Of Pakistan through Secretary and others 2020 PLC (C.S.) 1196
- Asmatullah Janejo vs Federation of Pakistan, etc 2020 IHC 116
- Waheed Khan and others vs Chief Secretary Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others 2021 PLC (C.S.) 1114
- Muhammad Iqbal & two others vs Govt. of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Peshawar & three others 2017 PHC 723
- MUHAMMAD IQBAL Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Peshawar 2018 PLC(CS)N 174
- Dr. KHUSHNOOD ALI BAZ and 111 others vs GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER 2018 YLR 512
- JDW SUGAR MILLS LTD and otherss vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others 2017 PLD Lahore 68
- JDW SUGAR MILLS LTD. and others vs PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others 2016 LHC 2910, 2017 PLD Lahore 68
- JDW Sugar Mills Ltd etc. vs Province of Punjab etc. 2016 LHC 2910
- AZRA JAMALI and others vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, M_o Commerce and another 2017 PLC (C.S.) 533
- FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and another vs Kh. SAAD SALEEM K.L.R. 2014 Civil Cases 366, 2014 PTD 1531
- Federal Board of Revenue and another vs Khawaja Saad Saleem K.L.R. 2014 Civil Cases 366
- Federal Board of Revenue vs Kh. Saleem. and another PTCL 2015 CL. 313
- TANVEER SHAKOOR vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and another 2014 CLD 803, 2014 PLD Lahore 482
- TANVEER SHAKOOR vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior 2014 CLD 803
- Tanveer Shakoor vs Federation of Pakistan, etc. 2014 P.C.T.L.R. 300
- Azra Jamali & others vs Federation of Pakistan, through Secretary, M/o 2016 IHC
- AZRA JAMALI and others vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o 2016 C.L.R. 573, 2016 PLJ Islamabad 464
- Azra Jamali and others vs Federation of Pakistan, through Secretary, M/o 2016 C.L.R. 573