Dr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAKI and anothers vs SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (OPERATION), RAWALPINDI and others
This is an order of the Supreme Court of Pakistan delivered by Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ, in a constitutional matter concerning the rights, identity, and social welfare of eunuchs. The core legal question revolves around the enforcement of fundamental rights, issuance of National Identity Cards, protection of life and property, and inheritance rights of eunuchs under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The Court held that eunuchs are equal citizens entitled to full constitutional protection of law, life, dignity, property, and inheritance without discrimination, and directed federal and provincial functionaries, police authorities, and departments of social welfare to implement prior court directives regarding their registration, appointment of focal persons, and protection. The key principle laid down is that state functionaries at all levels are constitutionally bound to protect the fundamental rights, dignity, and property rights of eunuchs, ensuring their social recognition and inclusion.
- Whether eunuchs are entitled to protection of life, property, and dignity as equal citizens under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973?
- Are federal and provincial governments bound to ensure the issuance of National Identity Cards and protect the inheritance rights of eunuchs?
- Can the police and administrative authorities be directed to report complaints involving eunuchs to the Registrar of the Supreme Court?
- Article 184(3), Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973
ORDER
' IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J.---Petitioner in person states that Chairman and Deputy Chairman of NADRA in compliance with directions of this Court have shown significant progress to resolve the issue of recording parentage and sex of the eunuchs and deliberations in this behalf are under consideration. A report has also been received from NADRA. We do appreciate for making efforts to resolve the problems of eunuchs about their identity. Essentially it is an important issue and we are hopeful that the Chairman NADRA on account of his sincere commitments and efforts shall be in a position to ensure that eunuchs are provided National Identity Cards so their status in the society is recognized and on account of showing sincere efforts we hereby observe that all concerned functionaries should extend cooperation to them.
2. Needless to observe that eunuchs in their own rights are citizens of this country and subject to the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, their rights, obligations including right to life and dignity are equally protected. Thus no discrimination for any reason, is possible against them as far as their rights and obligations are concerned. The Government functionaries both at Federal and Provincial levels are bound to provide them protection of life and property and secure their dignity as well, as is done in case of other citizens.
3. Similarly, Federal and Provincial Governments are equally responsible to recognize their rights.
The efforts so far made in this behalf on the part of, the Governments of Khyber Paldnunkhwa, Punjab and Sindh are, however, appreciated and we expect that Government of Balochistan would also protect the life and property as well as the dignity of the eunuchs accordingly.
4. It is true that some progress has been made but the Provincial Governments through the Secretaries Social Works Department are required to make more efforts to implement the directions of this Court contained in the orders dated 17-8-2009 and 23-12-2009. Copies of these orders be dispatched to them as well as the Commissioner Islamabad and to the Ministry of Social Welfare and Special Education, Government of Pakistan for implementation and report on the next date of hearing.
5. It has been noticed that whatever the complaints are registered for and against the eunuchs the same with action taken thereon are not intimated by the police to the Registrar of this Court.
Direction so contained in the order dated 17-8-2009 be repeated to all the PPOs and the I.-G. Police, Islamabad for compliance in letter and spirit.
6. While hearing this case it has been noticed that there is some gap of communication between the administration and the eunuchs perhaps for the reason that they have no representation or they do not have a focal person, therefore, Secretaries Social Welfare and Special Education, Islamabad, may adopt a strategy to appoint one or more than one focal person amongst them who may interact with the administration.
7. In the orders noted above we have pointed out for initiating process to locate the ascendants (parentage) of the eunuchs with a view that if the latter have any right of inheritance in moveable and immoveable properties, they should get the same according to law but it seems that no progress has been made in this behalf so far. Secretaries Social Welfare of all the provinces and Commissioner Islamabad who have already registered the eunuchs may seriously look into this aspect of the case and make efforts to ensure that their rights in the property as are devolved on them according to law, are fully protected.
8. Petitioner contends that after passing the orders a significant progress has begun to take place and social status of the eunuchs is being gradually recognized yet due to lack of awareness/ knowledge/ideas and information about the rights and obligations, concerning the eunuchs not conveyed in every nook and corner, they are not getting what is actually due to them, therefore, NGOs should come forward to disseminate the same appropriately. In this, it is however, observed that this is for the petitioner to interact with NGOs for the purpose because this Court is only interested, as it has been pointed out time ank again, that in terms of Article 184(3) of the Constitution the fundamental rights of the eunuchs are to be fully protected.
9. Let the case be' adjourned for a period of four weeks for further proceedings and the reports shall be submitted before the next date of hearing enabling the Court to go through the same to save the time.
Cited by 5 cases
- Nadeem Ul Zafar Khan vs Returning Officer, NA-47 & another 2024 IHC 30, 2024 PLD Islamabad 122
- Hammad Hussain and others vs Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice and others 2023 PLD Federal Shariat Court 301
- Faiz Ullah vs P.P.S.C., etc 2021 PLC (C.S.) 1091, 2021 PLD Lahore 284, 2021 LHC 153
- Mian Asia vs Federation of Pakistan etc. 2017 LHC 3212
- Muhammad Zahid Atta vs Lahore Development Authority (“LDA”) through Director General & others 2024 LHC 4935, 2025 PLC (C.S.) 314