Moulvi IQBAL HAIDER and others vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M_o Law and Justice and others
Constitutional petitions were filed in the Supreme Court of Pakistan seeking directions to the Federal Government to lodge a complaint under Article 6 of the Constitution against General (Retd.) Pervez Musharraf and others for high treason. The core legal question was whether the Federal Government was fulfilling its constitutional obligation to initiate legal proceedings under Article 6 and the relevant statutes for acts committed on November 3, 2007. The Federal Government submitted a statement undertaking that the Prime Minister directed the FIA to investigate the matter and that a complaint would be filed before a Special Court constituted under the Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1976. Accepting the Federal Government's commitment, the Supreme Court disposed of the petitions with the observation that the Federal Government shall proceed as per its undertaking without unnecessary delay. The Court refrained from making findings on the merits of the alleged high treason to avoid prejudicing any subsequent inquiry, investigation, or trial.
- Whether the Supreme Court can dispose of petitions seeking initiation of high treason proceedings upon receiving an undertaking from the Federal Government to investigate and prosecute the matter?
- Which authority holds the mandate to conduct investigation and file a complaint for the offence of high treason under Article 6 of the Constitution?
- Whether the Supreme Court should refrain from giving findings on allegations of subverting or holding the Constitution in abeyance during pending constitutional petitions to avoid prejudicing future investigative or trial proceedings?
- Article 6, Constitution of Pakistan 1973
- Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act 1976
- Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974
ORDER
' JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, J.---The petitioners in all these petitions have prayed that the Federal Government be directed to lodge a complaint under Article 6 of the Constitution against the respondent General (Retd.) Pervez Musharraf and otheRs, The Federal Government had filed an initial statement which has been reproduced in our order of 24-6-2013. In the said order, we had asked the learned Attorney-General to file a further statement "providing details of the actions envisioned by the Federal Government in the light of the present petitions and the process through which such actions will be given effect". Pursuant to the said order of 24-6-2013, the learned Attorney-General filed the following statement on 26-6-2013:-- "(1) The Prime Minister has directed the Secretary Interior to forthwith direct the Director-General FIA to constitute a special investigative team of senior officers to commence an inquiry and investigation in relation to the acts of General (R) Parvez Musharraf of 3rd November, 2007 that may amount to high treq son under Article 6 of the Constitution and to finalize as expeditiously as possible the statement of case to be put up by the Federal Government before the Special Court to be constituted under the Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1976.
(2) The Law entrusts the investigation of the offence of high treason to the FIA under entry No,14 of the Schedule of the FIA Act, 1974 read with sections 3(a) and 6 thereof. However, in order to ensure expeditious completion of the inquiry and investigation, the Prime Minister is also considering the constitution of a Commission to oversee and monitor the progress of the proceedings.
(3) On the completion of the investigation, the Federal Government shall file the requisite complaint under section 5 of the Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1976 and take steps to constitute the Special Court in accordance with section 4 of the said Act for the trial of the offence."
2. The prayer in these petitions thus effectively appears to have been accepted by the Government.
Moreover, the learned counsel representing the petitioners had also expressed their satisfaction with the statement, subject only to a reservation that no time frame for the inquiry had been given for conclusion of the inquiry/investigation of the case which was to be initiated by the Government.
The learned Attorney General has stated that the government has constituted an Inquiry Committee comprised of senior functionaries of the FIA and it will be upto the said Committee to undertake the investigation. We can expect IA that such investigation shall be concluded without unnecessary delay. We may also note that the learned counsel representing the respondent had also stated on the previous date of hearing that these matters to be brought to an end in view of the statement filed by the Iederal Government on 26-6-2013 as reproduced above. In addition, we had also taken into consideration the resolution of the Senate dated 23-1-2012 and have taken judicial notice of the speech of the President and that of the Prime Minister of Pakistan in the Parliament.
3. We are consciously, deliberately and as submitted by Mr. Muhammad Ibrahim Satti, learned Senior Advocate Supreme Court for the respondent, not touching the question of "abrogation" or "subversion" or "holding in abeyance the Constitution" or "any conspiracy in that behalf" or indeed the question of suspending or holding the Constitution in abeyance or the issue as to abetment or collaboration in the acts mentioned in Article 6 of the Constitution. This is so because any finding/observation or view expressed by us may potentially result in prejudice to the inquiry/investigation or subsequent trial should that take place as a result of such investigation.
4. The Federal Government has, as noted above, proceeded in furtherance of its constitutional obligation envisioned in Article 6 of the Constitution and for the present this suffices in terms of the said Article and the reliefs respectively sought by the petitioners in these petitions. We, therefore, dispose of these petitions in the above terms with the observation that the Federal Government shall proceed as per undertaking dated 26-6-2013, reproduced above without unnecessary delay.
Cited by 11 cases
- Taufiq Asif. vs General (Retd.) Pervez Musharraf and others_ 2024 SCP 87, 2024 PLD Supreme Court 610
- General (R) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2020 PLD 285
- IMRAN AHMAD KHAN NIAZI Versus MIAN MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF, PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN/MEMBER NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, PRIME MINISTER'S HOUSE, ISLAMABAD 2017 PLD 265
- ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR (Former Chief Justice of Pakistan) vs FEDERAL 2016 PLD Supreme Court 454, 2016 PLJ Sc 557, 2016 P SC 460, NLR 2016
- FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN vs GENERAL (R) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF 2015 NLR Criminal 226, 2015 P Cr. L J 1
- THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN vs GENERAL (R) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF 2015 NLR Criminal 226
- THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN--Complainant vs GENERAL (R) 2015 NLR Criminal 226
- Gen. (Retd.) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF through Attorney vs PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior and others 2014 PLD Sindh 389
- The FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior Division vs General (R) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF 2014 P Cr. L J 684
- General (R) Parvez Musharraf vs Nadeem Ahmed (Advocate) and another 2014 PSC 1219
- PARVEZ MUSHARRAF Versus NADEEM AHMED 2014 PLD 585