Pakistan Case Law
2013 PLC (C.S.) 1480

MUHAMMAD INAYAT GONDAL vs REGISTRAR LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2013 PLC (C.S.) 1480
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No,244-L of 2013
Date2013-03-07
Judge(s)Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry
Authored byAsif Saeed Khan Khosa
ResultOrder accordingly
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a petition filed in person by a petitioner facing hardship due to dismissal from service, whose Service Appeal No. 11 of 2012 remained pending before the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal. The core legal question concerned whether the Supreme Court should interfere in the administrative matters of the High Court to expedite the hearing of a service appeal. The Court held that it is generally slow in interfering with administrative matters of the High Court and declined to issue a direct order for early fixation. Instead, the Court laid down the principle that the appropriate remedy for expediting proceedings before a service tribunal under the High Court's administrative domain is to approach the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned through a proper application for administrative relief and facilitation of an early hearing.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether the Supreme Court should interfere in the administrative matters of a High Court regarding the fixation of a service appeal?
  • How can a litigant seek an early hearing of a pending service appeal before the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal?
service appealservice tribunaladministrative mattersexpeditious hearingSupreme Court jurisdiction

ORDER

1. ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J.---Instead of pressing this petition the petitioner appearing in person has submitted that he is facing grave hardship on account of dismissal from service and his Service Appeal No,11 of 2012 has not so far been heard by the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal. He has prayed that an appropriate observation may be made by this Court facilitating hearing of his Service Appeal lit an early date. This Court is generally slow in interfering with the administrative matters of a High Court and, thus, all that we can do for the petitioner at this stage is to direct the petitioner to file an application before the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court, Lahore for redressal of his grievance and if such an application is filed then we are sanguine that the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court, Lahore may consider passing an appropriate direction facilitating hearing of the petitioner's Service Appeal by the concerned Tribunal at its earliest convenience. This petition is disposed of with this IA observation.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.