ABDUL ALEEM vs SPECIAL JUDGE (CUSTOMS), LAHORE AND Other
This petition for leave to appeal was filed against a Lahore High Court judgment that dismissed a constitutional petition challenging criminal proceedings before a Special Judge (Customs). The petitioner had raised objections regarding the competency of the criminal proceedings, but the Special Judge formally charged him. After his criminal revision was dismissed, the petitioner sought annulment of the criminal case via a writ petition, which the High Court dismissed on the ground that it would not short-circuit the normal trial procedure through discretionary jurisdiction. The Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the High Court's approach, confirming that invoking writ jurisdiction to deflect or short-circuit the normal course of a criminal trial is impermissible. Aligning its decision with established precedent, the Court held that the writ petition was not competent and dismissed the petition for leave to appeal.
- Whether writ jurisdiction can be exercised to short-circuit or deflect the normal course of a criminal trial?
ORDER
1. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAHJ.-Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment dated 30th June, 1980 of the Lahore High Court whereby a constitutional petition arising out of an order passed by a Court of Criminal jurisdiction was dismissed.
2. A learned Special Judge (Customs) notwithstanding legal objections raised from the petitioner's side with regard to competency of the criminal proceedings before him, formally charged the petitioner. A criminal revision filed by the petitioner having been dismissed, he sought relief for the annul--ment of the criminal case through a writ petition and the same having been dismissed mainly on the ground that the High Court would not in its discretionary jurisdiction short-circuit for the normal procedure of trial as provided by law, the petitioner has now sought leave to appeal.
3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner in support of the grounds taken in this petition at some length, we are of the view that the approach of the learned Single Judge in the High Court in refusing to deflect the normal course of a criminal case through exercise of writ jurisdic--tion is not only, salutary but also in accord with the principles laid down by this Court in Ghulam Muhammad v. Muzammal Khan and 4 others (PLD1967SC317) although the case dealt with therein was under ordinary general law. In our view, the writ petition was not competent and having rightly been dismissed, there is no justification for entertaining this petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.
Cited by 10 cases
- Muhammad Hasan Nadeem and 2 other vs Model Customs Collectorate 2021 PTD 764
- SHAUKAT NAWAZ MIR and 2 others vs AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 P Cr. L J 1567
- ISLAMUDDIN SHAIKH vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others 2001 PLD Karachi 419
- YASIN SIDDIQUI vs THE STATE 2001 P Cr. L J 1331
- WAHID ALI ARIF CHISHTI vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others 2002 YLR 971
- MUHAMMAD NAWAZ BALUCH vs PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and 4 others 1999 MLD 359
- Mrs. SHAHIDA ZAHIR ABBASI and 4 others vs PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and others 1996 PLD Supreme Court 632
- Mian TARIQ AZMAT SHEIKH vs S.H.O., POLICE STATION F.I.A. (BANKING CIRCLE), AHMED PARK, KHANEWAL ROAD, MULTAN And 2 Other 1996 MLD 1362
- Mian TARIQ AZMAT SHEIKH vs S.H.O., POLICE STATION F.I.A. (BANKING CIRCLE), AHMED PARK, KHANEWAL ROAD, MULTAN and 2 others 1996 MLD 1362
- GULZAR and others vs THE STATE 1996 P Cr. L J 80