Muhammad Shahid Imran vs The State, etc.
The petitioner sought post-arrest bail in a criminal case registered under Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860, concerning the issuance of a dishonoured cheque. The core legal question before the Supreme Court was whether the petitioner was entitled to the grant of bail pending trial, considering the duration of his incarceration and the nature of the offence. The Court observed that the maximum punishment prescribed for the offence under Section 489-F is three years, and the petitioner had already remained in custody for over five months. Furthermore, the Court noted that the offence did not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898. Given that the challan had been submitted and trial proceedings were pending without significant progress, the Court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail. The judgment reinforces the principle that where an offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause and the accused has undergone a substantial period of pre-trial incarceration, bail should generally be granted unless exceptional circumstances exist.
- Is an offence under Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 covered by the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898?
- Does the submission of a challan and the delay in trial progress justify the grant of bail for an offence not falling within the prohibitory clause?
- Section 489-F, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 497, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
ORDER
1. JAAWAD S. KHAWAJA, J. --- We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in case F.I.R. No. 876, dated 22.11.2013 registered under Section 489-F, P.P.C. At Police Station Gulberg, Faisalabad. The maximum punishment under Section 489-F is three years. The petitioner has already been behind bars for more than five months. The case does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 498, Cr.P.C. The challan has been submitted in Court and witnesses of prosecution have been summoned. Further progress in the trial, however, has not taken place. In the foregoing circumstances, we allow bail to the petitioner on furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.