Pakistan Case Law
45 TAX 262

CHAUDHRI WIRE ROPE INDUSTRIES LTD. vs SALES TAX OFFICER, SPECIAL

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation45 TAX 262
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No. 277 of 1977
Date1981-10-17
Judge(s)Nasim Hasan Shah, Karam Elahi Chauhan
ResultLeave granted
Summary

This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal against the decision of a Sales Tax Officer regarding the taxability of a specific item. The core legal question presented to the Supreme Court of Pakistan is whether a Sales Tax Officer possesses the jurisdiction to re-open and re-examine the liability of an item to sales tax after having previously determined, in an earlier assessment order dated 21-2-1975 for the assessment year 1969-70, that the said item was exempt from such tax. The Court granted leave to appeal to consider this jurisdictional issue, specifically addressing the finality or binding nature of prior assessment orders on the same subject matter. The Court ordered the case to be prepared for hearing on the existing record within six months, allowing parties to submit additional documents, and directed that the existing interim order shall continue to operate until the final disposal of the matter.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does a Sales Tax Officer have the jurisdiction to re-open the question of tax liability for an item previously held as exempted in an earlier assessment order?
  • Can a tax authority revisit an assessment decision regarding the taxability of an item after a final assessment order has been issued for a specific assessment year?
sales taxassessment orderjurisdictionexemptionres judicatatax liability

1. ORDER [Karam Elahee Chauhan, J.].-Leave is granted to consider whether the Sales Tax Officer had the jurisdiction to re-open the question of liability of the item in dispute to sales-tax in spite of the fact that in an earlier assessm ent order dated 21-2-1975 for the assessment year 1969-70, he had held the said item as exempted. Security Rs. 2000/-. Case to be made ready for hearing on the present record within six months. Parties, however, shall be entitled to add such documents on which they want to rely. Interim order to continue in the meantime.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.