Muhammad Shahid Imran vs The State, etc.
This matter concerns a petition for post-arrest bail filed by the petitioner, Muhammad Shahid Imran, who was implicated in a criminal case registered under Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860. The core legal question before the Supreme Court was whether the petitioner was entitled to the grant of bail pending trial, considering the duration of his incarceration and the nature of the alleged offense. The Court observed that the maximum punishment prescribed for the offense under Section 489-F is three years, and the petitioner had already remained in custody for over five months. Crucially, the Court determined that the offense did not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898. Given that the challan had been submitted and prosecution witnesses summoned, but the trial had not significantly progressed, the Court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail. The judgment reinforces the principle that where an offense does not fall within the prohibitory clause of the relevant bail statute, the grant of bail is generally favored, especially when trial proceedings are delayed.
- Does an offense under Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898?
- Is a petitioner entitled to bail when the offense charged does not fall within the prohibitory clause and the trial has not significantly progressed?
- Section 489-F, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 497, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
ORDER
1. JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, J. --- We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in case F.I.R. No. 876, dated 22.11.2013 registered under Section 489-F, P.P.C. At Police Station Gulberg, Faisalabad. The maximum punishment under Section 489-F is three years. The petitioner has already been behind bars for more than five months. The case does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. The challan has been submitted in Court and witnesses of prosecution have been summoned. Further progress in the trial, however, has not taken place. In the foregoing 'circumstances, we allow bail to the petitioner on furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties such in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.