CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITYthrough Director General and 3 others vs Mir
This civil appeal was filed by the Civil Aviation Authority challenging a High Court of Sindh order that directed the regularization of respondent No. 1's service from the date he completed five years of employment. The respondent had been appointed on a contingency basis in 1995 and served for over five years until being 'de-hired' in 2001 due to medical reasons. The core legal issue concerned the maintainability of the respondent's writ petition, which was filed in 2011, approximately ten years after the cause of action arose. The Supreme Court observed that the respondent failed to provide any justification or explanation for the significant delay in approaching the court. Consequently, the Court held that the petition suffered from laches and was not sustainable. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order, affirming the principle that unexplained and excessive delay in seeking judicial relief disentitles a petitioner to discretionary remedies.
ORDER
1. ' MAQBOOL BAQAR, J.---Through the above Civil Appeal, the appellant authority has challenged the Order dated 6-11-2012 of a learned Division Bench of the High Court of Sindh, in terms whereof the petition filed by the respondent No.1 was allowed, with direction to the appellant to regularize the service of the petitioner/respondent No.1 from the date when he completed 5 years of his service.
2. The respondent No.1, who was on 28-6-1995 appointed on contingency continued to serve as such, for more than 5 years, however, on 31-7-2001 he was admitted in a hospital due to Urinary Retraction Numbness of lower limps, and was on account of his illness, "de-hired" with effect from 31-12-2001. Unfortunately it took the respondent No.1 A about 10 years in approaching the High Court, as the petition decided through the impugned order was so filed in the year 2011 only, and as rightly submitted by the Additional Attorney-General the same suffered from latches and ought to have been dismissed for having been filed after a lapse of about 10 years.
3. ' The respondent No.1, who appeared in person, despite opportunity failed to explain or justify the delay. Since the petition was filed after a lapse of almost 10 years and that too without any justification or explanation for such delay, the same ought to have been dismissed as such.
4. However through the impugned order the petition was instead allowed, which order, on account of the above noted delay in filing of the petition, is not sustainable. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the impugned order is accordingly set aside.
Cited by 24 cases
- Muazzam Ali Goraya etc vs Member (Judicial-I) etc 2025 LHC 323
- MUAZZAM ALI GORAYA Versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-I) 2025 CLC 1217
- Malik Amanat Rasul vs Federation of Pakistan etc 2024 LHC 5274, 2025 PLC (C.S.) 262
- Malik AMANAT RASUL Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2025 PLC(CS) 262
- Syed Ali Kazmi vs Government of Punjab and others 2023 LHC 4856, 2024 PLC (C.S.) 985
- Dr. Aftab Hassan Minhas vs National Council for Homeopathy etc. 2023 LHC 4805, 2024 PLC (C.S.) 84
- Ali Saeed Wahla vs Capital Development Authority through Chairman, Islamabad and others 2022 CLC 1132
- Ume Jameela vs Province of Punjab and others 2023 PLC (C.S.) 1507
- Asim Irfan Ahmad vs Additional District and Sessions Judge, Islamabad 2023 YLR 1123
- Rehan Khalid vs Mst. Uzma Nawaz and 3 others 2022 MLD 272
- Khurram Iftikhar and Others vs Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Interior Division, Islamabad and Others 2022 PCRLJ 1665
- Ghulam Yaseen Jalbani vs Secretary Ministry Of Science And Technology, Islamabad and 3 others 2021 PLC (C.S.) 951
- REEMA SHAMIM Versus PAKISTAN MEDICAL COMMISSION Fatima Tu Zara Butt , Taimoor Aslam 2021 MLD 1117
- Muhammad Qayyum vs The Director NCA Rawalpindi Campus etc 2020 [M] C L R 1580
- Irfan Ullah Khan vs Province Of The Punjab and others 2020 [M] C L R 1443, 2020 CLC 594
- Sajjad Hussain Constable NO.1076, Special Force District Swat vs Government Of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Home Secretary and 2 others 2020 PLC (C.S.) 822
- Dr. TAHIR MASUD vs AMJAD ALI KHAN and 4 others 2019 PLC (C.S.) 1167
- Prof. Dr. Muhammad Iqbal Zafar vs The Province of Punjab through Secretary to the Government of Punjab, Agriculture Department, Lahore etc 2019 [M] C.L.R. 670, 2019 PLC (C.S.) 63, 2018 LHC 1550
- Prof. Dr. MUHAMMAD IQBAL ZAFAR Versus THE PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary to the Government of Punjab, Agriculture Department, Lahore 2019 PLC(CS)N 63
- UMAR HAYAT KHAWAJA vs PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and 9 2018 PLC (C.S.) 889
- SUI NORTHERN OFFICERS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. vs MEMBER 2017 YLR 1348
- Sui Northern Officers Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. vs Member 2017 LHC 824
- MUHAMMAD NAEEM Versus DIRECTOR PUBLIC INSTRUCTION (SE), PUNJAB 2018 PLC(CS)N 52
- Asim Irfan Ahmed vs Learned Additional District And Sessions Judge, Islamabad etc 2022 PLJ Islamabad 40