Pakistan Case Law
1982 SCMR 623

HAYAT BAKHSH AND Others vs The STATE

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation1982 SCMR 623
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Appeal No. 53 of 1976
Date1981-07-07
Judge(s)Muhammad Haleem, Actg. C. J., Nasim Hasan Shah and Shafi‑ur‑Rehman
ResultOrders accordingly
Summary

This criminal appeal before the Supreme Court of Pakistan concerns the conviction of multiple appellants. The core legal question addressed by the Court pertains to the merits of the appellants' convictions and the procedural status of one appellant who is a fugitive from justice. The Court, in its order, accepted the appeals of Hayat Bakhsh, Muhammad Afzal, and Allah Bakhsh (son of Sikandar), resulting in their acquittal and immediate release, provided they are not required in any other legal matter. Conversely, the Court dismissed the appeal of the appellant Allah Bakhsh (son of Muhammad Bakhsh) on the specific ground that he is a fugitive from justice. The judgment establishes the principle that the appellate court may decline to entertain or dismiss an appeal filed by a convict who remains a fugitive from justice, while simultaneously granting relief to co-appellants whose convictions are found to be unsustainable upon review.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Can an appeal be dismissed if the appellant is a fugitive from justice?
  • Are co-appellants entitled to acquittal if their convictions are found to be unsustainable despite the fugitive status of another co-appellant?
criminal appealacquittalfugitive from justicedismissal of appealappellate jurisdiction

ORDER

1. MUHAMMAD HALEEM, ACTG. C. J.-For the reasons to be recorded later the appeal of Hayat Bakhsh son of Qaim Khan, Muhammad Afzal son of Muhammad Akram and Allah Bakhsh son of Sikandar, are accepted and they are acquitted. These appellants should be set at liberty forthwith, if theyl are not required in any other case. The appeal of Allah Bakhsh son of Muhammad Bakhsh, who is a fugitive from justice, is dismissed.

Cited by 2 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.