WAZIR GUL vs The STATE and 2 others
The petitioner, Wazir Gul, sought post-arrest bail in case FIR No. 49/2015 registered under sections 419, 420, 468, 471, 109 of the Pakistan Penal Code, section 30 of the NADRA Ordinance, section 14 of the Foreigners Act, and section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, after being denied relief by the Special Judge (Central) Peshawar. The core legal question was whether an Afghan national accused of fraudulently procuring Pakistani Computerized National Identity Cards (CNICs) in connivance with NADRA officials was entitled to post-arrest bail. The Peshawar High Court held that the accused was prima facie connected with a serious offense involving national security and was not entitled to bail. The petition was accordingly dismissed, with observations that the trial court should decide the case independently on its merits.
- Is a foreign national accused of fraudulently obtaining a Pakistani CNIC entitled to post-arrest bail?
- Does the procurement of Pakistani identity cards by non-nationals constitute a sufficient ground to deny bail during an ongoing terrorism wave?
- Section 419, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 420, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 468, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 471, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 109, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 30, NADRA Ordinance 2000
- Section 14, Foreigners Act 1946
- Section 5(2), Prevention of Corruption Act 1947
QAISER RASHID KHAN, J.---The petitioner, Wazir Gul, seeks bail in case FIR No, 49/2015 dated 30.3.2015 registered under sections 419, 420, 468, 471, 109, P.P.C. Read with sections 30 NADRA Ordinance, 14 Foreigners Act and 5(2), P.C. Act, Police Station FIA/ACC, Peshawar after the said relief was declined to him by the learned Special Judge (Central) Peshawar on 01.07.2015.
2. Allegations against the petitioner are that pursuant to a written complaint the FIA authorities conducted enquiry No,02/2015 wherein it was found that Wazir son of Said Akbar, Yousaf son of Wazir, Mattiullah son of Wazir resident of Yakatoot, Street No,2 Mohmand Abad, Syed Hassan Pir Road Peshawar presently House No, 912 Street No, 28, Sector F-9, Pfiase-6 Hayatabad Peshawar being Afghan nationals have fraudulently obtained Pakistani CNIC No, 17301-15197069-3, 17301- 91363335 and 17301-16730996-3 respectively in connivance with NADRA officals, hence the FIR ibid. Arguments heard and record perused.
3. As the record reveals, it was on the written complaint of one Imtiaz Hussain who alerted the FIA authorities and resultantly an enquiry was conducted whereby it was unearthed that the accused- petitioner along with his two sons though being Afghan Nationals have acquired Pakistani CNICs.
The main thrust of the arguments of the learned cqunsel for the petitioner is that the accused- petitioner has never claimed to be a Pakistani and that he admits himself to be an Afghan National presently settled in Germany with a German nationality. His next contention is that the father's name of the petitioner is Gul Khan but in the CNIC, his father's name has been shown to be Said Akbar and moreover, his real name is Wazir Gul but in the CNIC his name has been mentioned as Wazir and all these factors take the matter to one of further enquiry entitling the accused- petitioner to bail.
4. However, the record shows otherwise. The accused-petitioner managed to procure a Pakistani CNIC with his name as Wazir son of Said Akbar with his photograph sporting short beard. He also managed CNICs for his two sons namely, Yousaf son of Wazir and Matiullah son of W,azir.
Admittedly they are Afghan Nationals. Available on record is also a photocopy of the National Identity Card Form (in Urdu) on which too, the photograph of the petitioner surfaces prominently.
Moreover, there are sworn affidavits of several persons available on the file whereby they have testified to the effect that the accused-petitioner is an Afghan National and that he has obtained Pakistani CNICs for himself as well as for his two sons in connivance with NADRA officials.
5. Procuring a Pakistani CNIC by a foreign national is undoubtedly a serious offence and has become all the more serious in the present day scenario when the country is faced with a wave of terrorism in which foreign elements are involved. The accused-petitioner cannot feign ignorance about his Pakistani CNIC available on file. Being prima facie connected with the commission of the offence, the accused-petitioner. Is not entitled to be enlarged on bail.
Resultantly, this bail petition stands dismissed. However, it is directed that any observations recorded in this order, being purely tentative in nature, should in no way prejudice the proceedings before the learned trial Court where the case be decided on its own merits after recording evidence.
Before parting with this order, it is observed that such act of procuring Pakistani CNICs could not have been made possible except with the active collusion and connivance of the black sheep in the fold of NADRA. It is about time that such elements are identified and brought to book. A copy of this order be endorsed to the Director General NADRA Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Peshawar as well as Chairman, NADRA Headquarters Islamabad for information and necessary action.
Cited by 1 case
- YASIR RASHEED Versus State 2017 PCrLJN 224