FAIZ JALANI alias IMRAN MAMA vs The STATE and others
This petition for leave to appeal was directed against an order of the Lahore High Court whereby post-arrest bail was refused to the petitioner in a murder case registered under section 302 read with section 34 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860. The core legal question was whether the petitioner was entitled to post-arrest bail considering the evidentiary worth of the material collected during investigation. The Supreme Court of Pakistan observed that the murder was unwitnessed, the petitioner was not named as a culprit in the FIR, the recovery of mobile telephone sets lacked identification marks connecting them to the deceased, and no connection was established between the recovered handcart and the crime. Holding that the remaining piece of last-seen evidence required deeper scrutiny regarding its proximity, the Court concluded that the case fell within the purview of further inquiry under subsection (2) of section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898. Consequently, the appeal was allowed and the petitioner was admitted to bail, laying down the principle that tentative assessment of weak circumstantial and last-seen evidence can warrant post-arrest bail under the regime of further inquiry.
- Whether an unwitnessed murder with weak circumstantial evidence qualifies as a case for further inquiry under subsection (2) of section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898?
- Can unverified recoveries of mobile telephone sets and a handcart without identification marks serve as a strong basis to refuse post-arrest bail?
- Is a petitioner entitled to post-arrest bail when named in the FIR merely as an acquaintance rather than a direct culprit?
- Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 34, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 497, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
ORDER
ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J.---Through this petition Faiz Jalani alias Imran Marna petitioner has sought leave to appeal against the order dated 07.12.2015 passed by a learned Judge-in-Chamber of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14747-B of 2015 whereby post-arrest bail was refused to him in case FIR No. 17 registered at Police Station Shera Kot, District Lahore on 13.01.2015 in respect of an offence under section 302, P.P.C. read with section 34, P.P.C.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the record we have observed that admittedly the murder in issue had remained unwitnessed and although the petitioner's name had figured in the FIR yet his name had been mentioned therein not as a culprit but as a friend of Haji Imdad Hussain deceased. The only pieces of evidence being relied upon by the prosecution against the petitioner are the last-seen evidence, recovery of some mobile telephone sets and recovery of a handcart. Upon our query the learned Additional Prosecutor-General, Punjab appearing for the State has gone through the record of investigation and has informed that there is a Memorandum of Identification of the mobile telephone sets available on the record but the said memorandum does not disclose any mark of identification of the recovered mobile telephone sets so as to connect the same with the deceased. There is no evidence available on the record to establish any connection of the recovered handcart with the murder in question or with the alleged removal of the deadbody by using the said handcart. The only remaining piece of evidence is in the shape of last-seen evidence and the question of proximity vis-a-vis the said piece of evidence shall be attended to by the trial court on the basis of the evidence to be produced before it. In view of the factors noted above and the questions about evidentiary worth of the pieces of evidence available with the prosecution we have found the case against the petitioner to be a case calling for further inquiry into his guilt C within the purview of subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. This petition is, therefore, converted into an appeal and the same is allowed and consequently Faiz Jalani alias Imran Mama petitioner is admitted to bail in the above mentioned criminal case subject to furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Cited by 4 cases
- Awais S/o Abdul Hakeem, Javed S/o Manthar Ali vs The State 2025 SHC SUK 1636
- Anwar Ali Khaskheli and another vs The State 2022 MLD 570
- Mujtaba Hassan vs The State etc 2021 YLR 2233, 2020 PHC 90
- Roidad Khan vs The State & another 2020 PHC 78, 2022 MLD 660