FAYYAZ alias FIAZI vs The STATE
This criminal appeal arose out of the conviction and death sentence awarded to the appellant under Section 302(b) of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 by the trial court, subsequently confirmed by the Lahore High Court, for causing the death of the deceased by a firearm injury. The Supreme Court considered whether the conviction was justified on the evidence and whether the case warranted the imposition of capital punishment. Upon evaluating the ocular testimony of two eyewitnesses, fully corroborated by medical evidence, the Court affirmed that the prosecution had proved the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. However, regarding the quantum of sentence, the Court observed that only a single shot was fired without repetition and that the motive alleged by the prosecution suffered from an unreliable improvement. Consequently, the Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, maintaining the conviction under Section 302(b), PPC, but reducing the sentence of death to imprisonment for life, with compensation under Section 544-A and the benefit of Section 382-B of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 upheld.
- Can a death sentence for an offence under Section 302(b) of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 be commuted to life imprisonment where only a single shot was fired without repetition?
- Does an unreliable or improved motive serve as a mitigating circumstance to reduce a death sentence to imprisonment for life?
- Is a conviction under Section 302(b) of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 sustainable when ocular testimony is corroborated by medical evidence?
- Section 302, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 302(b), Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 544-A, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
- Section 382-B, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, J.---Appellant faced trial before the learned Sessions Judge Sialkot in case FIR No.27/1999 dated 20.02.1999 offence under section 302, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Head Marala, District Sialkot for the murder of Muhammad Asif (deceased) brother of the complainant. Vide judgment dated 23.07.2002, he was convicted and sentenced as under:- "...Resultantly, accused Fayyaz alias Fiazi is convicted under section 302(b), P.P.C. and punished with Death as "Tazir" having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case. He shall be hanged by neck till he is dead. He is directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (two lacs) as compensation to the legal heirs of the deceased as per provisions of section 544-A, Cr. P. C. The compensation shall be recoverable through Arrears of Land Revenue and in case of default in payment of compensation or non recovery of same through Arrears of Land Revenue the accused shall suffer six months' S.I.
2. Aggrieved of the judgment passed by the learned trial court, the appellant preferred Criminal Appeal No.295-J of 2002 which was heard along with Murder Reference No.668 of 2002 sent by the learned trial court and a learned Division Bench of Lahore High Court through the impugned judgment dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant and confirmed his sentence of death. Being still dissatisfied with the judgment of the learned appellate court, Fayyaz alias Fiazi convict preferred Criminal Petition No.416-L of 2008 wherein leave was granted vide order dated 27.09.2009 hence this appeal.
3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Additional Prosecutor General for the State and have gone through the available record with their able assistance.
4. This is a case of single accused wherein the appellant has been nominated with the specific allegation of causing firearm injury in the left side of chest near armpit of Muhammad Asif (deceased). The occurrence took place in a grocery shop. Ocular account was furnished by Zafar Iqbal/complainant (PW.2) brother of the deceased and Muhammad Riaz (PW.3), owner of the shop.
The ocular account is fully A supported by the medical evidence furnished by Dr. Muhammad Aslam (PW.5), who conducted autopsy on the dead body of Muhammad Asif (deceased).
Therefore, we are of the view that the prosecution case stood proved against the appellant beyond any shadow of doubt and his conviction under section 302(b), P.P.C. recorded by the learned trial court and maintained by the learned Division Bench of Lahore High Court was fully justified.
However, we hold that it is not a case of capital punishment because only a single fire-shot was attributed to the appellant and there was no allegation of repetition of firing against him. Moreover, the learned High Court observed in the impugned judgment that 'the improved part of the motive cannot be relied upon'. Therefore, while maintaining conviction of the appellant under section 302(b), P.P.C., his sentence of death is altered to imprisonment for life. The amount of compensation i.e. Rs.2,00,000/- (two lakh only) payable to the legal heirs of Muhammad Asif (deceased) and the sentence of six months simple imprisonment in default as ordered by the learned trial court and maintained by the learned appellate court is upheld. Benefit of section 382- B, Code of Criminal Procedure is extended to the appellant. With this modification in the quantum of sentence of Fayyaz alias Fiazi (appellant), this appeal is partly allowed.
Cited by 9 cases
- Shah Zamin and others vs The State and another 2025 PHC 6
- The State vs Shakeel Shah 2022 LHC 5220
- Hamza Yaqoob and others vs State and another PLJ 2022 Cr.C. 1603
- Hamza Yaqoob and others vs The State and others 2022 YLR 1924
- Saeed Ahmed Choliani vs Muhammad Ramzan 2020 SHC 1296
- SAEED AHMED CHOLIANI Versus State 2022 PCrLJN 34
- AZMAT ULLAH Versus State 2020 PCrLJN 86
- MUHAMMAD JAVED vs The STATE and another 2019 YLR 1208
- Dilbar Dahar vs The State 2024 SHC 250