Pakistan Case Law
2017 P.S.C. 536

M/s. State Life Insurance Corporation and others vs Muhammad Imran

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2017 P.S.C. 536
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition Revision No. 430.-K of 2015
Date2016-03-29
Judge(s)Khilji Arif Hussain, Faisal Arab
ResultLeave granted
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns a petition for leave to appeal filed by the State Life Insurance Corporation challenging the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal to adjudicate a service-related grievance brought by the respondent, Muhammad Imran. The core legal question presented for the Court's consideration is whether the existence of statutory rules governing the employment of the State Life Insurance Corporation ousts the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal, thereby necessitating that the respondent seek redressal exclusively through the High Court. The Supreme Court, noting the absence of the respondent despite service of notice, granted leave to appeal to examine this jurisdictional issue. The judgment focuses on the interplay between statutory service rules and the tribunal's mandate, specifically addressing whether such rules preclude the Service Tribunal from entertaining service disputes involving the corporation's employees. By granting leave, the Court has determined that the question of whether the High Court is the only appropriate forum for such grievances, rather than the Service Tribunal, warrants a definitive legal determination by the Supreme Court.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does the existence of statutory rules for the State Life Insurance Corporation oust the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal?
  • Is the High Court the only appropriate forum for seeking redressal of service grievances for employees governed by statutory rules of the State Life Insurance Corporation?
service tribunal jurisdictionstatutory rulesleave to appealservice grievancejurisdictional competence

ORDER

' FAISAL ARAB, J. --- Inspite of service of notice, the respondent has not appeared. We have been informed that respondent's sister had received notice. It is the case of the petitioners that State Life Insurance Corporation has statutory rules, therefore, the Service Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide the matter and the only forum for the respondent to seek redressal of his grievance is High Court.

2. Leave is granted in this petition inter alia to consider the above question of law.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.