MUHAMMAD ASHRAF- vs THE STATE
This matter came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan as an appeal against the judgment of the High Court, which had recorded convictions and sentences against the appellant, Muhammad Ashraf. The core legal question before the Supreme Court was whether the convictions and sentences imposed by the High Court were sustainable in law. Upon consideration of the case, the Supreme Court, acting according to the opinion of the majority of the bench, dismissed the appeal. Consequently, the Court upheld the convictions and sentences previously recorded by the High Court. The judgment serves as a final adjudication confirming the lower court's findings of guilt and the associated sentencing, effectively concluding the appellate proceedings.
- Does the Supreme Court have the authority to uphold convictions and sentences recorded by the High Court in an appeal?
- What is the effect of a majority opinion in an appeal before the Supreme Court of Pakistan?
1. ORDER OF THE COURT According to the opinion of the majority this appeal is dismissed and the convictions and sentences recorded by the High Court are upheld. s. A. H.Appeal dism isse d.
Cited by 2 cases
- ATTAULLAH vs THE CHAIRMAN, SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others 2002 PLC 311
- ANWAR ALI vs Mrs. ALIMA AHMED 1991 CLC 1231