BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE & SECONDARY EDUCATION, D.G. KHAN & another vs MUHAMMAD ALTAF and others
This petition was filed by the Board of Intermediate & Secondary Education, D.G. Khan, challenging a judgment of the Lahore High Court which directed the regularization of the respondents' services. The respondents had been employed as Drivers, Clerks, Naib Qasids, and Security Guards on a daily wage basis for significant periods, some dating back to 1996. The core legal issue concerned the practice of terminating employment contracts every 89 days and resuming them after a one-day interval to prevent the continuity of service. The Supreme Court observed that the respondents had served for more than nine months and that the artificial breaks were introduced with mala fide intent to avoid legal obligations regarding regularization. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, finding no legal lacuna in the order that restrained the Board from making fresh appointments through advertisement while the respondents' services had matured for regularization. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, affirming that artificial breaks in service cannot be used to deny employees their right to regularization.
ORDER
Maqbool Baqar, J.--Brought into question, through this petition is the judgment dated 25.9.2017, whereby a learned Division Bench of the Lahore High Court dismissed in limine the appeal filed by the petitioner-Board challenging the order dated 01.6.2017, in terms whereof a learned Single Judge of the said Court allowed the writ petition filed by the respondents for their regularization in service with the petitioner-Board.
2. The respondents were employed by the petitioner-Board, they have been working as Drivers, Clerks, Naib Qasids and Security Guards, for a considerable period of time, on daily wages. Some of them have been so working since the year 1996. However, their employment contracts were terminated after every 89 days and were resumed a day there after. All of them have certainly served the petitioner-Board for not less than nine months, however with artificial breaks, as noted above, this was done to break the continuity of their service with mala fide intent to avoid their regularization. The respondents, despite the fact that their services had matured and were under the law required to be regularized, and instead of doing so, as noted in the judgment of the learned Single Judge, contemplated to make fresh appointments through advertisement, which prompted the respondents to file the writ petition which culminated into the impugned judgment.
3. We in the circumstances as noted above, do not find any lacuna in impugned judgment, legal or otherwise, and find no justification for interfering with the same. The petition is therefore dismissed.
Cited by 36 cases
- Muhammad Nawaz etc vs M/s. Cadbury Pakistan Ltd., Karachi and others 2025 PLJ Tr.C. (NIRC) 49
- PAKISTAN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD) through Director General G-9, Islamabad Versus SAJJAD AZIZ, WAITER 2026 PLC 162
- Hasnain Afzal etc vs Government of Punjab etc 2023 LHC 5502
- PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LIMITED Versus HUMAYYUN SHAHZAD 2026 PLC 143
- M/s Instaclear (Pvt.) Ltd. through its Head, Karachi & another vs Malik 2022 LHC 8248, 2024 PLC 292
- Yasir Ali & Ayaz Ali Panhwer vs Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Others 2022 SHC 178
- Muhammad Shafique vs Government Of Punjab and others 2022 PLC (C.S.) 282
- Muhammad Haleem Shah and 35 others vs Federal Government 2022 PLC (C.S.) 412
- Syed Ali Hamza and others vs Province Of The Punjab and others 2022 PLC (C.S.) 525
- Province Of Punjab through Secretary, Irrigation Department, Jhang vs Sajjad Naseem and 3 others 2022 PLC 44
- Shabbir Ahmed etc vs The Auditor General of Pakistan & 3 others 2021 IHC 76
- Nisar Ahmed and others vs Capital Development Authority 2022 PLC 111
- Sikandar Hayat & others vs Chief Secretary Khyber Pakhtunkhwa & others 2020 PHC 176
- SIKANDAR HAYAT Versus CHIEF SECRETARY KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PESHAWAR 2021 PLC(CS)N 30
- Abid Alam vs Govt. of Pakistan & others 2020 PHC 52
- Board Of Intermediate And Secondary Education, Sahiwal and another vs Akhtar Usman and 2 others 2020 PLC (C.S.) 1036
- Mst. Ghulam Zuhra Jahangir and another vs Vice-Chancellor, University Of The Punjab, Lahore and 8 others 2020 PLC (C.S.) 285
- SANAULLAH Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Higher Education, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar 2021 PLC(CS)N 6
- AURANGZEB KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Safran 2020 PLC(CS) 599
- Maqsood Ahmed & 09 others vs Federation of Pakistan & others 2019 SHC 354
- Dr. Fozia Akmal vs Province of Sindh & 04 others 2019 SHC 314
- Lal Khan, etc vs Government of Punjab, etc 2021 KLR Labour & Service Cases 178
- NIAMAT ULLAH Versus The PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT GILGIT-BALTISTAN 2023 PLC(CS)N 50
- Ms. Nazia Munir vs The Government of the Punjab etc 2020 [M] C L R 1525, 2019 PLC (C.S) 1077, 2019 LHC 699
- Ms. NAZIA MUNIR Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2019 PLC(CS) 1077
- Syed MUHAMMAD FAWAD BUKHARI Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, ABBOTABAD 2020 PLC(CS) 581
- Dr. Asha Bai vs The Chairman Karachi Port Trust & others 2018 SHC 682
- Yasir Ali Baloch and another vs Province of Sindh 2018 SHC 622
- KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Versus COMMISSIONER WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION HAZARA DIRECTOR AT HARIPUR 2019 PLC 18
- Province of Punjab through Secretary, Agriculture Department and another 2020 [M] C LR 283
- Hafeez Ahmad and 3 others vs Province Of Punjab through Secretary 2021 PLJ Lahore 778
- Mir Nawaz and others vs Federal Government Employees Housing 2021 IHC 314
- Muhammad Rasheed, etc vs Government Of The Punjab through Secretary 2021 PLJ Lahore 191
- Sohail & others vs Pakistan National Shipping 2021 SHC 418
- Municipal Committee Kehror Pakka through Chief Officer and others vs Dilshad Ahmad and others PLJ 2022 Tr.C. (Labour)11
- Province of Punjab and 05 others vs Jaffar Ahmed and 02 others, Mubashar Ali Shahzad and 02 others 2023 LHC 2596