Pakistan Case Law
2018 MLD 920

Mst. REHANA and another vs The STATE through Additional Advocate-

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2018 MLD 920
CourtPeshawar High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.160-M of 2017
Date2017-05-03
Judge(s)Muhammad Ibrahim Khan
ResultBail granted.
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arises from a post-arrest bail petition filed by Mst. Rehana and Dawood, who were implicated in FIR No. 73 dated 03.03.2017 registered under sections 496-A and 109 of the Pakistan Penal Code at Police Station Dargai, District Malakand. The core legal question was whether the petitioners were entitled to post-arrest bail given the circumstances of the alleged enticement and subsequent marriage. The Peshawar High Court held that the contents of section 496-A of the Pakistan Penal Code were not attracted against the female petitioner, especially considering her statement that she contracted marriage of her own free will and had previously filed a complaint against her parents. The court decided that the case fell within the scope of further inquiry into the guilt of the accused under section 497(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, granting both petitioners post-arrest bail subject to surety bonds. The key principle laid down is that where an adult female voluntarily contracts marriage and denies abduction, charges under section 496-A of the Pakistan Penal Code require further inquiry, making the accused persons eligible for bail.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether the offense under section 496-A of the Pakistan Penal Code is attracted when an adult female states she contracted marriage of her own free will?
  • Are accused persons entitled to post-arrest bail when their case falls within the scope of further inquiry into their guilt?
  • Does a statement recorded under section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by an alleged abductee carry weight in a bail application?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Section 496-A, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 109, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 22-A, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
  • Section 200, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
  • Section 452, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
  • Section 506, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
post-arrest bailenticement of womanfree will marriagefurther inquiryNikah

MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN, J.---Mst. Rehana and Dawood Petitioners herein, being implicated in case FIR No. 73 dated 03.03.2017 charged under sections 496-A, 109, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Dargai District Malakand are jointly looking for their post arrest bail.

2. Prior to, an application bearing No.132/4 of the year 2017 was preferred before the Court of learned Sessions Judge/Zila Qazi Malakand Camp Court Dargai, which was dismissed by an order dated 12.04.2017.

3. Gul Badshah who has come up as complainant reported that his daughter Mst. Rehana was engaged one year prior to making of this report. The 'Nikah' was performed with Fawad son of Qabil Muhammad. His daughter Mst. Rehana is a student of Bachelor of Arts. She is a sports girl who has achieved many medals for her outstanding performance in various competitions. In order to participate in games she often used to visit different cities and then to return after 8/9 days. On this day falling on 01.02.2017 Mst. Rehana on the pretext to participate in games to be held in Lahore left her house when by now 12 days have been passed, but she has not yet returned. On collection of the information, it has now been disclosed that this time she had not gone to Lahore and on further information it is as learnt that she was enticed by Dawood son of Habib-ur-Rahman resident of Jaban Dargai for the purpose of marriage. Behind this act of contracting marriage Fida Muhammad son of Abdaal Nana resident of Sakhakot abetted performance of Nikah being taken her by a Datson bearing No. AFR 017. While she left the house had taken away valuables golden ornaments 10 tolas and Rs. 300,000/- in cash. While making the report previous Nikah- Nama/Mehr-Nama of Mst. Rehana his daughter were produced as token of evidence.

4. Having heard arguments of learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and learned State counsel, record with their assistance gone through.

5. Learned counsel for the Petitioners referred to 2011 MLD 1048 (Peshawar) "Abdul Ghafoor v. The State and another", 2011 MLD 1020 (Lahore) "Mukhtiar Ahmad v. The State and others", 2013 YLR 990 (Peshawar) "Said Nawab and 2 others v. The State through Additional Advocate General and another", 2010 YLR 312 (Peshawar) "Imran Bhatti and another v. Province of Sindh", 2010 PCr.LJ 961 (Lahore) "Amir v. The State and another", 2013 YLR 2220 (Lahore) "Muhammad Zeeshan Zarif v. The State and another" and PLD 2013 Lahore 538 "Iqra Javed alias Saba v. Station House Officer and others". In the light of these dictums of the Hon'ble superior Courts prayed for the grant of bail in favour of the Petitioners. On other hand, learned counsel for the complainant assisted by learned State counsel though did not place reliance on any precedents of the Hon'ble superior Courts, however vehemently opposed the submissions put-forward by learned counsel for the Petitioners and prayed for utter dismissal of the bail petition being bereft of merits.

6. This case is registered at the instance of learned Justice of Peace Dargai by way of acceptance of an application under section 22-A, Cr.P.C. As far as applying of section 496-A, P.P.C. with regard to the role of Mst. Rehana is taken for, learned State counsel frankly admitted that the contents of section 496-A, P.P.C. being defined under the mentioned section of law would not be attracted as to keep her behind the bars.

7. In the case of Petitioner Dawood who is said to have contracted marriage with Mst. Rehana for consideration of Mehr of Rs. 5,000/-, which was paid there and then at the time of solemnizing of the Nikah. To this effect there are dower entries in the Nikah-Nama at Serial Nos. 13 and 14.

8. The Petitioner Mst. Rehana's credentials are available on the file, she being sports girl has participated in sports fixtures at Government Girls Secondary School. She being a successful Taekwondo player, who has given Taekwondo training and Referee Courses. She has participated in 11th Korean Ambassador Junior National Taekwondo Championship 2016. She being a complainant of complaint under section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code read with sections 452, 506, P.P.C. pertaining to City Division Sheikhupura against her parents including Fawad, who at the time was in contact being betrayed to him. She has recorded her statement on 09.02.2017 before the learned Judicial Magistrate Sheikhupura. This statement would reveal she has contracted marriage on 06.02.2017 with Dawood Khan on her own free will and consent and nobody forced her. She has further stated that she has never been abducted and she on her own free will left the house of her parents with adding information that she has not taken any valuables along with her while leaving the house of her parents.

9. Had there reason to believe that Mst. Rehana being abducted or enticed by co- accused/Petitioner Dawood she would never lodge this complaint against her own parents. This minimize the possibility of registration of case under section 496-A, P.P.C. against the accused/ Petitioners. There are reasons to believe that this is a case of further inquiry into the guilt of the accused/Petitioners, who have now entered into Nikah and both of them verify the same. However it is open for the prosecution to prove earlier Nikah in between Mst. Rehana and Fawad Khan.

10. In view of the above observations, both the Petitioners are entitled to the concession of bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 200,000/- (Rupees two lacs) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court, who shall ensure that the sureties are local, reliable and men of means.

11. These are the reasons of my short order of even date.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.