Ghani Khan vs The State and another
This matter arises from a petition seeking leave to appeal against the order of the Peshawar High Court, which had refused post-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 1253 registered under Sections 324/34 of the Pakistan Penal Code at Police Station Chamkani. The core legal question was whether the petitioner was entitled to the concession of bail given the nature of the allegations and supporting medical evidence. The Supreme Court held that the petitioner was specifically named in the FIR with a definite role of firing at the complainant, which resulted in injuries supported by medical evidence, and that the alleged offence fell within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition and refused leave to appeal. The key principle laid down is that an accused named in the FIR with a specific role of causing firearm injuries supported by medical evidence, where the offence falls within the prohibitory clause, is not entitled to post-arrest bail.
- Is an accused named in the FIR with a specific role of firing entitled to post-arrest bail when the injury is supported by medical evidence?
- Does an offence falling within the prohibitory clause bar the grant of bail under Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the absence of mitigating circumstances?
- Section 324, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 34, Pakistan Penal Code 1860
- Section 497(2), Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
ORDER
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, J.---Through this petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 29.01.2018 whereby bail was refused to the petitioner by the learned Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in case FIR No.1253 dated 10.1 1.2017, of fence under sections 324/34, P .P.C., registered at Police Station Chamkani.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner , learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perusal of available record, it has been observed by us that the petitioner" is named in the FIR with specific role of firing at the complainant Hazrat Ullah, which as per the statement of the complainant, hit him on his right thigh and right side of his chest. The said allegation is prima facie supported by the medical evidence. The offence alleged against him falls within the prohibitory clause of section 497(2) Code of Criminal Procedure. In these circumstances he is not entitled to the concession of bail.
3. For the foregoing, this petition having no merit is dismissed and leave to appeal is refused.
Cited by 5 cases
- Muhammad Ali vs The State and another 2022 MLD 312
- Hamza Sadaqat vs The State and another 2022 YLR 1024
- ALI GUL Versus State 2022 PCrLJN 67
- KASHIF SHABBIR Versus State 2022 YLRN 179
- ASIMULLAH Versus State 2022 YLRN 74