Pakistan Case Law
2020 SHC 544

Ibrahim & Ors vs The State

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2020 SHC 544
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Cr. Bail Application No.S-770 of 2020
Date2020-08-10
Judge(s)Abdul Maalik Gaddi
ResultApplication disposed off
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns an application for the confirmation of interim pre-arrest bail filed by the applicants, who were accused of causing injuries to the complainant party using kicks and fists. The core legal question was whether the applicants were entitled to confirmation of their pre-arrest bail given the circumstances of the case, including the delay in the registration of the First Information Report (FIR) and the fact that a co-accused, who was armed with a weapon, had already been granted bail by the trial court. The High Court observed that there was an inordinate delay of 19 days in lodging the FIR without a satisfactory explanation. Furthermore, the court noted that the applicants were on better footing than the co-accused who had already received bail. Since the investigation was complete and the challan had been submitted, the court held that the applicants were no longer required for investigative purposes. Consequently, the court confirmed the interim pre-arrest bail, emphasizing that the observations made were tentative and should not influence the trial court's final decision on the merits.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Does an inordinate, unexplained delay in the registration of an FIR constitute a ground for the confirmation of pre-arrest bail?
  • Is an accused entitled to bail on the principle of parity if a co-accused has already been granted bail by the trial court?
  • Should pre-arrest bail be confirmed when the investigation is complete and the challan has been submitted to the court?
pre-arrest bailconfirmation of baildelay in FIRcriminal proceduretentative assessmentbail parity

ORDER

Applicants are present on interim bail granted to them by this Court vide order dated 17.07.2020. Today the same is fixed for confirmation or otherwise.

2. The allegation against the applicants/accused is that on 08.06.2020 (day of incident) the present applicants alongwith co-accused Muhammad Saleh caused kicks and fists blow to the complainant party with further allegation that accused Muhammad Saleh, who was armed with lathi has caused lathi blow to the complainant at his arm.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants/ac cused submits that applicants are innoc ent and they have falsely been implicated in this case by the complainant party due to enmity over matrimonial affairs; that no specific role has been attributed to the applicants; that alleged injuries are not on vital part and prosecution story is false and concocted one; that there is inordinate delay of 19 days in lodgement of FIR; that co-accused Muhammad Saleh has been granted bail by learned Trial Court, as such applicants/accused are also entitled for same relief. He lastly prayed that interim bail already granted to the applicants/accused may be confirmed.

4. Learned DPG has extended no objection on the pretext that co-accused Muhammad Saleh, has already been granted bail.

5. Arguments heard record perused.

6. It is noted that the alleged incident took place on 08.06.2020, whereas, the same was reported to the police on 27.06.2020 after the delay of about 19 days, for which no satisfactory explanation has been furnished. It is also noted that co-accused Muhammad Saleh, who was armed with lathi has already been granted bail by the learned Trial Court, vide order dated 28.07.2020 and the case of present applicants appears to be on better footings, as the applicants allegedly has only caused kicks and fists blow to the complainant party . Moreover , the case has been challaned and the applicants/accused are no more required for further investigation. Under these circumstances, I have no option but to confirm the interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicants/accused. Accordingly , interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicants/accused vide order dated 17.07.2 020 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. Applicants/accused are directed to attend the Trial Court and to face the trial.

7. Needless to say that observations made, hereinabove, are tentative in nature, hence the learned Trial Court shall not be influenced in any manner whatsoever while deciding the case on merit.

Instant bail application stands disposed of in above terms.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.