Imran Abbas vs The State and another
This matter concerns a petition for post-arrest bail filed by the accused, Imran Abbas, who is charged with the murder of his former wife, Maria Mughal. The petitioner sought bail primarily based on an affidavit sworn by the complainant, the deceased's sister, which attempted to exonerate him by attributing the crime to unknown dacoits, contradicting her initial complaint. The Court observed that the complainant had previously identified the petitioner as the assailant. The core legal question addressed was whether the complainant's subsequent affidavit, which contradicted her initial statement, warranted the grant of bail. The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' refusal to grant bail, viewing the affidavit as a crude attempt to subvert prosecution evidence. The Court emphasized that witness protection is a sine qua non for the effective administration of criminal justice, casting a bounden responsibility upon the State to safeguard vulnerable witnesses. Consequently, the Court directed the Inspector General of Police to ensure the complainant's safe conduct to testify without duress and ordered the trial court to expedite proceedings.
- Does a complainant's subsequent affidavit exonerating an accused, which contradicts their initial complaint, automatically entitle the accused to bail?
- What is the State's responsibility regarding the protection of vulnerable witnesses during a criminal trial?
- Can a trial court refuse bail when it perceives that an affidavit submitted by a complainant is a calculated attempt to subvert prosecution evidence?
ORDER
QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.--Maria Mughal, deceased, was done to death within the safety of her dwelling allegedly, by Imran Abbas, petitioner herein, no other than her former husband; her younger sister Ms. Talal Sahr witnessed the occurrence that occurred at 2:00 p.m. on 15.8.2019; solitary fire shot in the skull has been blamed as cause of death; upon petitioner's disclosure, a .30 caliber pistol was recovered from the petitioner on 31.8.2019. The petitioner moved Court of Session Islamabad (West) for admission to bail on the basis of an affidavit purportedly sworn by the complainant wherein she exonerated him from the charge; it appears from the record that the complainant presented herself before Mr. Basil Aleem, learned Addl. Sessions Judge Islamabad (West) to affirm the contents of the affidavit; the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, however, and wisely so, viewed the move as the one calculated to subvert the prosecution evidence and declined the request.
A learned Judge-in-Chamber upheld the dismissal. The issue came up before us on 8.7.2020; surprised by a sudden somersault, that too, in a manner, too crude to be viewed as plausible, we sent for the Superintendent of Police; he is in attendance along with the Investigating Officer; the former states that the complainant after the incident had sought refuge in a public sanctuary (Dar-ul-Aman) whereafter she of own accord left for her village. We are at a loss to understand as to what weighed with the complainant to substitute "unknown dacoits" as the assassins of her sister through the affidavit dated 03.10.2019 while she had unambiguously blamed her former brother-in-law for the cold blooded incident through a written application moved just as close as on 15.8.2019.
2. Be that as it may and without prejudice to the petitioner's right for a fair trial to be settled, on the strength of evidence alone with all statutory/procedural safeguards, we, in circumstances, consider it expedient to direct the Inspector General of Police Islamabad Capital Territory to ensure safe conduct throughout to Ms. Talal Sahr complainant so as to enable her to appear before the Court to adduce her evidence without let, hindrance or duress. It goes without saying that for effective and meaningful administration of criminal justice, witness protection is a sine qua non and as such a bounden responsibility is cast upon the State to be discharged through its functionaries to safeguard vulnerable witnesses in order to ensure that stream of justice runs pure and clean with scales strictly held in balance. Learned trial Judge is directed to proceed with the trial with all convenient dispatch to preferably conclude it before the fall of October, 2020, Chief Commissioner Islamabad is directed to depute a diligent and capable Law Officer to prosecute the State case; he shall also consider the desirability of a trial in jail premises, if need be, Compliance reports regarding steps taken be submitted for our perusal in the chambers,
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon reconsideration, has opted to withdraw the petition; dismissed as withdrawn,