Pakistan Case Law
2020 SCP 192

Muhammad Tariq vs Afzal Hussain

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2020 SCP 192
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No. 3998/2016
Date2020-10-12
Judge(s)Qazi Faez Isa, Amin-Ud-Din Khan
ResultN/A
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter arose during the hearing of a civil petition for leave to appeal when an adjournment was sought owing to the elevation of the petitioner's counsel as Advocate General Punjab. Concurrently, an officer of the Court raised concerns regarding the involvement of the Advocate General in bar politics and the participation of the Prime Minister of Pakistan in a partisan function held at a public venue using public resources. The Supreme Court observed that these issues engaged fundamental rights and public importance under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. Consequently, the Court initiated separate proceedings by taking suo motu cognizance of the matter, issuing notices to the Advocate General Punjab, the Prime Minister, the Attorney-General for Pakistan, PEMRA, the authority operating the Convention Centre, and various bar councils. The Court directed the constitution of a separate file and placed the matter before the Chief Justice for the constitution of an appropriate bench.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Whether the Supreme Court can take suo motu notice under Article 184(3) of the Constitution regarding the misuse of public offices and state property for political purposes?
  • Can public buildings and official positions such as the Prime Minister and the Advocate General be utilized for partisan political functions?
  • Does the involvement of the Advocate General in bar politics affect the integrity of statutory disciplinary bodies like the Provincial Bar Council?
Laws & provisions referred
  • Article 18, Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973
  • Article 25, Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973
  • Article 26, Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973
  • Article 184(3), Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973
  • Article 248, Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973
  • Order XXVII-A, Code of Civil Procedure 1908
  • Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973
suo motu noticefundamental rightsmisuse of public propertybar politicspublic importanceconstitutional jurisdiction

ORDER

An application for adjournment has been submitted by Mr. Mehmood A. Sheikh, learned AOR, on behalf of, 'Mr. Ahmed Awais, ASC representing the petitioner ' stating that Mr. Ahmed Awais has been 'elevated as Advocate General Punjab', therefore, the petitioner may be granted time to engage another counsel. We sent for the highest law officer of the province of Punjab present at Islamabad and Mr. Muhammad Qasim Chohan, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab ('AAG'), is in attendance. We enquired from the learned AAG when Mr. Ahmed Awais was appointed as Advocate General, Punjab ('AG') and he stated that this happened on 29 July 2020. Therefore, there was more than sufficient time to engage another counsel. Be that as it may in the interest of justice the learned AOR (who is not in attendance) and the petitioner may engage the services of another counsel within two weeks.

2. Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, who is an officer of this Court and the Additional Secretary , Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan ('the Association' ), is present in Court and states that Mr. Ahmed Awais as AG should not involve himself in Bar politics and he is the ex officio Chairman of the Punjab Bar Council, which is the disciplinary body of lawyers, but unfortunately , the learned AG continues to be actively involved in Bar politics and participated in a function held by a particular segme nt of the legal community to canvass support for their candidate in the upcoming elections of the Association and was in the forefront of the function held at the Convention Centre, Islamabad, which was broadcast on all television channels where he can be seen sitting with the Prime Minister of Pakistan. He states that the Prime Minister of Pakistan is the Prime Minister of each and every citizen and cannot align himself with a particular group and all the more so in a function which is held in a public venue and paid for by the tax payers.

3. The concerns expressed by Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah involve serious issues, including the maintenance of the integrity of public offices and Fundamental Rights, including Articles 18, 25, 26 and the prescribed oath of office of the Prime Minister . Since the matter appears to be of 'public importance with reference to the enforcement of any of the Fundamental Rights' in terms of Article 184(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan ('the Constitution') this Court accordingly takes notice.

4. Notice to be issued to Mr. Ahmed Awais, the learned AG. However , since he appears to be personally conflicted it will be appropriate that the next highest office holder represents the Province of Punjab. Notice to be also issued to the Prime Minister , Mr. Imran Khan, since the utilization by him of public building , that is, the Convention Centre, Islamabad, was for a private function which apparently had no concern with 'the exercise of powers and performance of functions' of his office (in terms of Article 248 of the Constitution). We also issue notice to the learned Attorney-General for Pakistan in terms of Order XXVII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure since the interpretation of the provisions of the Constitution and the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973 is involved. The learned law officers and all concerned should also come prepare d to dilate on whether a public building and the public offices of the Prime Minister and the Advocate General Punjab can be used for personal and or the political purposes of the political party to which they belong.

5. The authority which operates the Convention Centre, Islamabad be sent notic e to submit its report about the following:

(1) Who sought permission for the use of the Convention Centre in respect of the said function?

(2) Who granted permission for the use of the Convention Centre?

(3) Whether a bill was raised and payment made, and if so, by whom, for the use of the Convention Centre?

(4) The answers to the aforesaid be submitted with supporting documents.

6. Notice be also sent to the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority ('PEMRA ') to submit the following:

(1) A copy of the complete recording of the said function held in the Convention Centre.

(2) A transcript of the above.

(3) The television channels which had broadcast the said function live, which had broadcast it later and how many times.

7. Notices to be also sent to the Pakistan Bar Council, the Supreme Court Bar Association and the Punjab Bar Council to assist in the matter as it also appears to involve the integrity of Bar elections and of the office of the AG/Chairman, Punjab Bar Council.

8. Since this Court has taken notice in terms of paragraph 2 onwards a separate file be prepared and numbered in respect of this matter by the office and to place it before the Hon'ble Chief Justice for constitution of an appropriate Bench to hear the case.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.