2020 SHC 1116
Muhammad Yaseen vs The State
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.
This matter involves a jail appeal filed by the appellant before the Sindh High Court. During the proceedings, the learned counsel for the appellant stated that a regular appeal had already been filed on behalf of the appellant, rendering the present jail appeal redundant. Consequently, the counsel did not press the instant jail appeal. The court accepted the statement and disposed of the jail appeal accordingly.
Questions settled in this judgment
- Whether a jail appeal can be disposed of when a regular appeal has already been filed by the appellant's counsel?
ORDER
1. It is stated by learned counsel for the appellant that he has already filed a regula r appeal on behalf of appellant; therefore, no useful purpose would be served, if this appeal which is preferred by the appellant through jail is pursued. By stating so, he does not press the instant Jail Appeal. It is disposed of accordingly .