Pakistan Case Law
2020 SHC 734

Ranjhan & Ors vs The State

⭐ Prefer in Google
Citation2020 SHC 734
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Bail Application No.S-636 of 2020
Date2020-08-28
Judge(s)Rashida Asad
ResultApplication disposed off
AI Summary — generated from this judgment; read the full text below and verify before relying on it.

This matter concerns a post-arrest bail application filed by the applicants, Ranjhan and others, seeking release pending trial. The core legal question before the court was whether the applicants were entitled to the concession of bail in the circumstances of the case. Upon consideration of the matter, the court allowed the bail application. The court held that the applicants are granted bail, subject to the condition of furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 50,000 each, along with a Personal Recognizance (P.R.) bond of an equivalent amount, to the satisfaction of the trial court. The key principle applied is that the grant of bail is a judicial discretion exercised by the court to ensure the attendance of the accused at trial while upholding the presumption of innocence, provided the accused meets the requisite financial security conditions set by the court. The application was disposed of accordingly, with detailed reasons to be recorded in a subsequent order.

Questions settled in this judgment
  • Are the applicants entitled to post-arrest bail?
  • What are the conditions for the grant of bail in this matter?
post-arrest bailbail applicationsurety bondjudicial discretioncriminal procedure

ORDER

1. For the reasons to be recorded later, the bail application is allowed and both the applicants are granted bail subject to their furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (fifty thousand) each and P.R Bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of trial court.

2. Bail application disposed of along with listed application.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.