Sheikh IQBAL AZAM FAROOQUI through Legal Heirs vs The STATE through Chairman NAB
This matter arises from a criminal petition filed by the legal heirs of the deceased convict, Sheikh Iqbal Azam Farooqui, challenging the order of the High Court of Sindh which disposed of his pending criminal appeal as abated upon his death while keeping the sentence of fine intact to be realized from his estate. The core legal question concerns whether a criminal appeal against conviction abates entirely upon the death of the appellant notwithstanding the persistence of financial liabilities such as fines affecting his estate. The Supreme Court of Pakistan held that while corporal consequences of a conviction wither away with the death of the convict, financial liability shifted upon the estate requires the appellate court to decide the appeal on its merits. The Supreme Court set aside the impugned order of the High Court and directed that the appeal, sustained by the legal heirs, shall be deemed pending for adjudication on merits. The key principle laid down is that Section 431 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 does not warrant the abatement of an appeal regarding financial liabilities impinging upon the estate of a deceased convict without a decision on merits.
- Does a criminal appeal abate entirely upon the death of the convict when a sentence of fine remains attached to his estate?
- Whether an appellate court is required to decide an appeal on its merits when financial consequences of a conviction continue to impinge upon the estate of a deceased appellant?
- How does the death of a convict affect the corporal versus financial consequences of a conviction under Section 431 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898?
- Section 9(a)(viii), National Accountability Ordinance 1999
- Section 431, Code of Criminal Procedure 1898
QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J. Sheikh Iqbal Azam Farooqui, since demised, was tried by an Accountability Court at Karachi; he was arrayed in the reference alongside Javed Iqbal Farooqui, Iftikhar A. Shaikh and Shaikh Mansoor Ahmed, away from law till date, proceeded accordingly; held guilty under section 9(a)(viii) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, he was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Impris onment for seven years with a direction to pay Rs. 5.187 million as fine, to be recovered as arrears of land revenue; upon his death, a learned Division Bench of High Court of Sindh, disposed of his appeal as having been abated, while keeping amount of fine intact to be realized from his estate vide impugned order dated 21.3.2019, vires whereof are being disputed herein.
2. Learned counsel for the legal heirs of the deceased convict contends that notwithstanding death of the convict, his appeal, admitted to regular hearing during his life time, merited full dress regular adjudication as not only his name required vindication but also for the additional reason that his estate, devolving upon the legal heirs, was burdened with impugned conviction. While referring to the provisions of section 431 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, law declared by this Court in the cases of Dr. Ghulam Hussain (represented by 8 heirs) v. The State (1971 SCMR 35) and Muhammad Shamoon (deceased) throu gh legal representatives v. The State and another (2019 SCMR 1144) has been referred to argue that there was no occasion for the learned High Court to short circuit the pending proceedings with fiscal consequences of the conviction still impinging upon the estate. The learned Law Of ficer has contested the motion.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. Corporal consequences of a conviction wither away with the death of the conv ict, therefore appeal filed by the convict would automatically abate, as the death severs all temporal links with his corpus. However , financial liability , consequent upon conviction and shifted upon the estate, would certainly require the appellate court to decide the appeal on its own merit as in the event of its failure, the liability is to be exacted from the assets devolving upon the legal heirs. A plain reading of section 431 of the Code ibid confirms the above contemplation of law. Criminal petition is converted into appeal; allowed . The impugned order is set aside. Appeal filed by the deceased, being sustained by his legal heirs, shall be deemed as pending before the High Court for adjudication on merits.
Cited by 7 cases
- Hazrat Noor Versus State 2025 YLR 1371
- Asmat Ullah Khan and others vs The State and others 2024 SCP 231, PLJ 2024 SC (Cr.C.) 251, 2024 PLD Supreme Court 1119
- Khuda Bakhsh vs The State 2022 LHC 8195
- Khuda Bakhsh and another vs The State 2023 MLD 1983
- Mehar Ali Solangi vs The State 2022 SHC 162
- Sheikh Rizwan Ahmed Jillani vs National Accountability Bureau (NAB) 2024 MLD 161
- State through Advocate General of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad vs Muhammad Tasaddaq 2024 PLJ AJ&K 67